Ana Cláudia Vieira, C. Barata, J. Carvalho, Marta Fradinho, Maria L. A. A. Oliveira, F. Nogueira
{"title":"Nonobese Patients With Obstrutive Sleep Apnea (OSA):A Challenging Group","authors":"Ana Cláudia Vieira, C. Barata, J. Carvalho, Marta Fradinho, Maria L. A. A. Oliveira, F. Nogueira","doi":"10.1183/23120541.sleepandbreathing-2019.p123","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: OSA is an underdiagnosed disorder that hinders quality of life (QoL). There9s lack of knowledge on physiopathology and therapy effectiveness in nonobese patients(NOP). Objectives: Compare OSA’s symptoms and severity, problems with CPAP adherence, effectiveness of therapy, comorbidities and QoL between NOP and obese patients (OP). Methods: Retrospective study of patients who attended respiratory sleep medical appointments in a central hospital. Data on patients’ demographics, comorbidities and therapy effectiveness were collected from clinical records. Problems with CPAP adherence and QoL were evaluated through phone interview. Differences between OP(BMI=30kg/m2) and NOP were compared. Results: Sample of 117patients (62%males, mean age 64y), 67%OP. The majority of OP and NOP had moderate-severe OSA(73%vs66% respectively, p=0.47) and cardiovascular comorbidities (86%OP had=2comorbitidies vs 69%NOP, p=0.03).NOP used more hypnotic drugs (44%vs 26%OP, p=0.04), were less compliant to CPAP therapy(>70% days of use>4h:47%vs 56%, p=0.3) and had higher residual AHI with CPAP(residual AHI Conclusion: NOP with OSA are challenging to treat:they have similar severity, morbidity and less compliance to therapy than OP. Promotion of CPAP adherence and alternative therapies are crucial once QoL improves with OSA treatment.","PeriodicalId":427707,"journal":{"name":"Obstructive Sleep Apnoea","volume":"77 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Obstructive Sleep Apnoea","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1183/23120541.sleepandbreathing-2019.p123","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: OSA is an underdiagnosed disorder that hinders quality of life (QoL). There9s lack of knowledge on physiopathology and therapy effectiveness in nonobese patients(NOP). Objectives: Compare OSA’s symptoms and severity, problems with CPAP adherence, effectiveness of therapy, comorbidities and QoL between NOP and obese patients (OP). Methods: Retrospective study of patients who attended respiratory sleep medical appointments in a central hospital. Data on patients’ demographics, comorbidities and therapy effectiveness were collected from clinical records. Problems with CPAP adherence and QoL were evaluated through phone interview. Differences between OP(BMI=30kg/m2) and NOP were compared. Results: Sample of 117patients (62%males, mean age 64y), 67%OP. The majority of OP and NOP had moderate-severe OSA(73%vs66% respectively, p=0.47) and cardiovascular comorbidities (86%OP had=2comorbitidies vs 69%NOP, p=0.03).NOP used more hypnotic drugs (44%vs 26%OP, p=0.04), were less compliant to CPAP therapy(>70% days of use>4h:47%vs 56%, p=0.3) and had higher residual AHI with CPAP(residual AHI Conclusion: NOP with OSA are challenging to treat:they have similar severity, morbidity and less compliance to therapy than OP. Promotion of CPAP adherence and alternative therapies are crucial once QoL improves with OSA treatment.