Nonobese Patients With Obstrutive Sleep Apnea (OSA):A Challenging Group

Ana Cláudia Vieira, C. Barata, J. Carvalho, Marta Fradinho, Maria L. A. A. Oliveira, F. Nogueira
{"title":"Nonobese Patients With Obstrutive Sleep Apnea (OSA):A Challenging Group","authors":"Ana Cláudia Vieira, C. Barata, J. Carvalho, Marta Fradinho, Maria L. A. A. Oliveira, F. Nogueira","doi":"10.1183/23120541.sleepandbreathing-2019.p123","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: OSA is an underdiagnosed disorder that hinders quality of life (QoL). There9s lack of knowledge on physiopathology and therapy effectiveness in nonobese patients(NOP). Objectives: Compare OSA’s symptoms and severity, problems with CPAP adherence, effectiveness of therapy, comorbidities and QoL between NOP and obese patients (OP). Methods: Retrospective study of patients who attended respiratory sleep medical appointments in a central hospital. Data on patients’ demographics, comorbidities and therapy effectiveness were collected from clinical records. Problems with CPAP adherence and QoL were evaluated through phone interview. Differences between OP(BMI=30kg/m2) and NOP were compared. Results: Sample of 117patients (62%males, mean age 64y), 67%OP. The majority of OP and NOP had moderate-severe OSA(73%vs66% respectively, p=0.47) and cardiovascular comorbidities (86%OP had=2comorbitidies vs 69%NOP, p=0.03).NOP used more hypnotic drugs (44%vs 26%OP, p=0.04), were less compliant to CPAP therapy(>70% days of use>4h:47%vs 56%, p=0.3) and had higher residual AHI with CPAP(residual AHI Conclusion: NOP with OSA are challenging to treat:they have similar severity, morbidity and less compliance to therapy than OP. Promotion of CPAP adherence and alternative therapies are crucial once QoL improves with OSA treatment.","PeriodicalId":427707,"journal":{"name":"Obstructive Sleep Apnoea","volume":"77 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Obstructive Sleep Apnoea","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1183/23120541.sleepandbreathing-2019.p123","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: OSA is an underdiagnosed disorder that hinders quality of life (QoL). There9s lack of knowledge on physiopathology and therapy effectiveness in nonobese patients(NOP). Objectives: Compare OSA’s symptoms and severity, problems with CPAP adherence, effectiveness of therapy, comorbidities and QoL between NOP and obese patients (OP). Methods: Retrospective study of patients who attended respiratory sleep medical appointments in a central hospital. Data on patients’ demographics, comorbidities and therapy effectiveness were collected from clinical records. Problems with CPAP adherence and QoL were evaluated through phone interview. Differences between OP(BMI=30kg/m2) and NOP were compared. Results: Sample of 117patients (62%males, mean age 64y), 67%OP. The majority of OP and NOP had moderate-severe OSA(73%vs66% respectively, p=0.47) and cardiovascular comorbidities (86%OP had=2comorbitidies vs 69%NOP, p=0.03).NOP used more hypnotic drugs (44%vs 26%OP, p=0.04), were less compliant to CPAP therapy(>70% days of use>4h:47%vs 56%, p=0.3) and had higher residual AHI with CPAP(residual AHI Conclusion: NOP with OSA are challenging to treat:they have similar severity, morbidity and less compliance to therapy than OP. Promotion of CPAP adherence and alternative therapies are crucial once QoL improves with OSA treatment.
非肥胖阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA)患者:一个具有挑战性的群体
简介:阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA)是一种未被诊断的疾病,影响生活质量(QoL)。对非肥胖患者(NOP)的生理病理及治疗效果认识不足。目的:比较NOP和肥胖患者(OP)的OSA症状和严重程度、CPAP依从性问题、治疗效果、合并症和生活质量。方法:对某中心医院呼吸睡眠门诊就诊的患者进行回顾性研究。从临床记录中收集患者的人口统计学、合并症和治疗效果的数据。通过电话访谈评估CPAP依从性和生活质量问题。比较OP(BMI=30kg/m2)与NOP的差异。结果:117例患者中,男性占62%,平均年龄64岁,67%为op。多数OP和NOP存在中重度OSA(分别为73%和66%,p=0.47)和心血管合并症(86%OP和69%NOP分别有2例合并症,p=0.03)。NOP使用更多催眠药物(44%vs 26%OP, p=0.04),对CPAP治疗的依从性较低(>70%使用天数>4小时:47%vs 56%, p=0.3),并且CPAP治疗的残留AHI较高(残留AHI结论:NOP合并OSA治疗具有挑战性:它们的严重程度、发病率与op相似,对治疗的依从性较低。一旦OSA治疗改善生活质量,促进CPAP依从性和替代疗法至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信