Development of Seismic Countermeasures Against Cliff Edges for Enhancement of Comprehensive Safety of Nuclear Power Plants: Cliff Edges Relevant to NPP Building System

A. Nishida, Byunghyun Choi, H. Yamano, T. Takada
{"title":"Development of Seismic Countermeasures Against Cliff Edges for Enhancement of Comprehensive Safety of Nuclear Power Plants: Cliff Edges Relevant to NPP Building System","authors":"A. Nishida, Byunghyun Choi, H. Yamano, T. Takada","doi":"10.1115/PVP2018-85066","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study identified and quantified possible cliff edge effects through a seismic safety evaluation of a nuclear power plant, based on the concepts of risk and defense in depth. Cliff edges of the both physical and knowledge-oriented type were considered in this study. We investigated a seismic isolation effect, etc., for physical cliff edges, and the modeling of the target structure, boundary conditions, etc., for knowledge-oriented cliff edges.\n Response analysis was performed using a sway-rocking (SR) model and a three-dimensional model of the target building. The seismic isolation effect of the base-isolated building was confirmed by comparison to the results of earthquake-resistant building. In the case of a collision with the retaining wall of the base-isolated building, the level of damage was found to depend on the modeling of the collision condition assumed. On the other hand, the study confirmed the differences between the results from the SR model and the three-dimensional model. And the greater fidelity of the three-dimensional model was also confirmed. This paper presents and discusses these results.","PeriodicalId":180537,"journal":{"name":"Volume 8: Seismic Engineering","volume":"76 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Volume 8: Seismic Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/PVP2018-85066","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This study identified and quantified possible cliff edge effects through a seismic safety evaluation of a nuclear power plant, based on the concepts of risk and defense in depth. Cliff edges of the both physical and knowledge-oriented type were considered in this study. We investigated a seismic isolation effect, etc., for physical cliff edges, and the modeling of the target structure, boundary conditions, etc., for knowledge-oriented cliff edges. Response analysis was performed using a sway-rocking (SR) model and a three-dimensional model of the target building. The seismic isolation effect of the base-isolated building was confirmed by comparison to the results of earthquake-resistant building. In the case of a collision with the retaining wall of the base-isolated building, the level of damage was found to depend on the modeling of the collision condition assumed. On the other hand, the study confirmed the differences between the results from the SR model and the three-dimensional model. And the greater fidelity of the three-dimensional model was also confirmed. This paper presents and discusses these results.
提高核电站综合安全的悬崖边地震对策研究&与核电厂建设系统相关的悬崖边
本研究基于风险和防御的深度概念,通过对核电站的地震安全评估,确定并量化了可能的悬崖边缘效应。本研究同时考虑了物理型和知识型的悬崖边缘。我们研究了物理悬崖边缘的隔震效应等,以及面向知识的悬崖边缘的目标结构建模、边界条件等。采用摇摆模型和目标建筑的三维模型进行响应分析。通过与基础隔震建筑隔震效果的比较,证实了基础隔震建筑的隔震效果。在与基础隔离建筑的挡土墙碰撞的情况下,发现损伤程度取决于假设的碰撞条件的建模。另一方面,研究证实了SR模型与三维模型结果的差异。三维模型的逼真度也得到了证实。本文介绍并讨论了这些结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信