{"title":"Evaluation of a new commercial assay kit for quantification of lactate dehydrogenase isoenzyme 1 in serum.","authors":"M Panteghini, R Bonora, F Pagani","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A new method for measuring lactate dehydrogenase (EC 1.1.1.27) isoenzyme 1 using sodium perchlorate as a chaotropic chemical selective inhibitor of all lactate dehydrogenase isoenzymes containing M-subunit was evaluated. Results with this method were precise (between-day coefficient of variation less than 9%), highly linear (coefficient of correlation = 0.9998) and correlated well with lactate dehydrogenase isoenzyme 1 as determined by the conventional immunological method (coefficient of correlation = 0.976). The reference interval for 307 healthy subjects was estimated to be 23-46 U/l (95% central range, determined non-parametrically). Being simple, convenient and amenable to automation, the method provides a substantial saving in labour and reagent costs when compared with alternative analytical approaches.</p>","PeriodicalId":15649,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical chemistry and clinical biochemistry. Zeitschrift fur klinische Chemie und klinische Biochemie","volume":"28 8","pages":"545-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1990-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of clinical chemistry and clinical biochemistry. Zeitschrift fur klinische Chemie und klinische Biochemie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
A new method for measuring lactate dehydrogenase (EC 1.1.1.27) isoenzyme 1 using sodium perchlorate as a chaotropic chemical selective inhibitor of all lactate dehydrogenase isoenzymes containing M-subunit was evaluated. Results with this method were precise (between-day coefficient of variation less than 9%), highly linear (coefficient of correlation = 0.9998) and correlated well with lactate dehydrogenase isoenzyme 1 as determined by the conventional immunological method (coefficient of correlation = 0.976). The reference interval for 307 healthy subjects was estimated to be 23-46 U/l (95% central range, determined non-parametrically). Being simple, convenient and amenable to automation, the method provides a substantial saving in labour and reagent costs when compared with alternative analytical approaches.