A Framework for Systematic Evaluation of Process Improvement Priorities

T. Birkhölzer, C. Dickmann, J. Vaupel
{"title":"A Framework for Systematic Evaluation of Process Improvement Priorities","authors":"T. Birkhölzer, C. Dickmann, J. Vaupel","doi":"10.1109/SEAA.2011.52","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Each process improvement project must prioritize and select the areas or aspects to focus on. Moreover, each such selection needs to be communicated, motivated, and justified to all stakeholders (management as well as participating or affected parties). For both challenges, a conceptual framework and tool set is presented in this paper which is based on a quantitative model of the relations between improvement efforts and outcomes. These relations are represented as weighted dependency graph with extensions for time dynamics as well as uncertainties. The graph can be used for a goal-driven search of strategies as well as for simulation analysis of specific scenarios. The development of the graph basically requires a systematic documentation of the expectations or experiences in the respective context. The framework is outlined at the example of agile process fragments based on a knowledge base of evidential data.","PeriodicalId":107972,"journal":{"name":"2011 37th EUROMICRO Conference on Software Engineering and Advanced Applications","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2011 37th EUROMICRO Conference on Software Engineering and Advanced Applications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SEAA.2011.52","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Each process improvement project must prioritize and select the areas or aspects to focus on. Moreover, each such selection needs to be communicated, motivated, and justified to all stakeholders (management as well as participating or affected parties). For both challenges, a conceptual framework and tool set is presented in this paper which is based on a quantitative model of the relations between improvement efforts and outcomes. These relations are represented as weighted dependency graph with extensions for time dynamics as well as uncertainties. The graph can be used for a goal-driven search of strategies as well as for simulation analysis of specific scenarios. The development of the graph basically requires a systematic documentation of the expectations or experiences in the respective context. The framework is outlined at the example of agile process fragments based on a knowledge base of evidential data.
过程改进优先级的系统评价框架
每个过程改进项目必须确定优先级,并选择要关注的领域或方面。此外,每个这样的选择都需要与所有利益相关者(管理层以及参与或受影响的各方)进行沟通、激励和证明。对于这两个挑战,本文提出了一个概念框架和工具集,该框架和工具集基于改进努力和结果之间关系的定量模型。这些关系被表示为加权依赖图,具有时间动力学和不确定性的扩展。该图可用于目标驱动的策略搜索以及特定场景的模拟分析。图表的开发基本上需要对各自上下文中的期望或经验进行系统的文档记录。该框架以基于证据数据知识库的敏捷过程片段为例进行概述。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信