Suitable LMS Content and Format for Training

Saleh Alghamdi, A. Bayaga
{"title":"Suitable LMS Content and Format for Training","authors":"Saleh Alghamdi, A. Bayaga","doi":"10.1109/NCG.2018.8593176","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The current paper explored Learning Management Systems (LMS) preferred content and format for training in Saudi Arabian universities. In this study, 222 faculty members from six selected universities responded to the questionnaires. The findings revealed that despite 50% of the respondents made use of LMS in their various universities, only 15, 6% preferred using LMS actively for contents/activities concerning teaching, learning and assessments. It was indicated that LMS be used for distributing only course content specifications, broadcasting announcements, and preparing teaching handouts rather than conducting on-line examinations. Furthermore, training on LMS must be organised based on individual courses, be delivered by familiar expects having university’s teaching programs and practices at heart and be offered in 2-hour sessions over several days or weeks. There was moderately strong association between computer proficiency and preference for tailored LMS delivery $\\varphi$ = 0.384, p = 0.000. The authors argue that in conducting future LMS training courses, the proposed content and format could be built based on LMS usages and trainees’ preferences. In broad view, addressing the shortage of faculty members’ technical skills could lead to increased LMS adoption in Saudi universities.","PeriodicalId":305464,"journal":{"name":"2018 21st Saudi Computer Society National Computer Conference (NCC)","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 21st Saudi Computer Society National Computer Conference (NCC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/NCG.2018.8593176","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The current paper explored Learning Management Systems (LMS) preferred content and format for training in Saudi Arabian universities. In this study, 222 faculty members from six selected universities responded to the questionnaires. The findings revealed that despite 50% of the respondents made use of LMS in their various universities, only 15, 6% preferred using LMS actively for contents/activities concerning teaching, learning and assessments. It was indicated that LMS be used for distributing only course content specifications, broadcasting announcements, and preparing teaching handouts rather than conducting on-line examinations. Furthermore, training on LMS must be organised based on individual courses, be delivered by familiar expects having university’s teaching programs and practices at heart and be offered in 2-hour sessions over several days or weeks. There was moderately strong association between computer proficiency and preference for tailored LMS delivery $\varphi$ = 0.384, p = 0.000. The authors argue that in conducting future LMS training courses, the proposed content and format could be built based on LMS usages and trainees’ preferences. In broad view, addressing the shortage of faculty members’ technical skills could lead to increased LMS adoption in Saudi universities.
适合培训的LMS内容和格式
本论文探讨了学习管理系统(LMS)在沙特阿拉伯大学中首选的培训内容和形式。本研究选取6所大学222名教师参与问卷调查。调查结果显示,尽管50%的受访者在各自的大学使用LMS,但只有15.6%的人更愿意积极使用LMS进行有关教学、学习和评估的内容/活动。有人指出,LMS将只用于分发课程内容说明、广播公告和准备教学资料,而不是用于在线考试。此外,LMS的培训必须基于个别课程组织,由熟悉的期望教授,并以大学的教学计划和实践为核心,在几天或几周内提供2小时的课程。计算机熟练程度与定制LMS交付偏好之间存在中等强关联$\varphi$ = 0.384, p = 0.000。作者认为,在未来的LMS培训课程中,建议的内容和格式可以根据LMS的使用和学员的喜好来构建。从广泛的角度来看,解决教师技术技能不足的问题可能会导致沙特大学更多地采用LMS。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信