A First Look at Certification Authority Authorization (CAA)

Quirin Scheitle, Taejoong Chung, Jens Hiller, Oliver Gasser, Johannes Naab, R. V. Rijswijk-Deij, O. Hohlfeld, Ralph Holz, D. Choffnes, A. Mislove, G. Carle
{"title":"A First Look at Certification Authority Authorization (CAA)","authors":"Quirin Scheitle, Taejoong Chung, Jens Hiller, Oliver Gasser, Johannes Naab, R. V. Rijswijk-Deij, O. Hohlfeld, Ralph Holz, D. Choffnes, A. Mislove, G. Carle","doi":"10.1145/3213232.3213235","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Shaken by severe compromises, the Web’s Public Key Infrastructure has seen the addition of several security mechanisms over recent years. One such mechanism is the Certification Authority Authorization (CAA) DNS record, that gives domain name holders control over which Certification Authorities (CAs) may issue certificates for their domain. First defined in RFC 6844, adoption by the CA/B forum mandates that CAs validate CAA records as of September 8, 2017. The success of CAA hinges on the behavior of three actors: CAs, domain name holders, and DNS operators. We empirically study their behavior, and observe that CAs exhibit patchy adherence in issuance experiments, domain name holders configure CAA records in encouraging but error-prone ways, and only six of the 31 largest DNS operators enable customers to add CAA records. Furthermore, using historic CAA data, we uncover anomalies for already-issued certificates. We disseminated our results in the community. This has already led to specific improvements at several CAs and revocation of mis-issued certificates. Furthermore, in this work, we suggest ways to improve the security impact of CAA. To foster further improvements and to practice reproducible research, we share raw data and analysis tools.","PeriodicalId":403234,"journal":{"name":"Comput. Commun. Rev.","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"32","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Comput. Commun. Rev.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3213232.3213235","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 32

Abstract

Shaken by severe compromises, the Web’s Public Key Infrastructure has seen the addition of several security mechanisms over recent years. One such mechanism is the Certification Authority Authorization (CAA) DNS record, that gives domain name holders control over which Certification Authorities (CAs) may issue certificates for their domain. First defined in RFC 6844, adoption by the CA/B forum mandates that CAs validate CAA records as of September 8, 2017. The success of CAA hinges on the behavior of three actors: CAs, domain name holders, and DNS operators. We empirically study their behavior, and observe that CAs exhibit patchy adherence in issuance experiments, domain name holders configure CAA records in encouraging but error-prone ways, and only six of the 31 largest DNS operators enable customers to add CAA records. Furthermore, using historic CAA data, we uncover anomalies for already-issued certificates. We disseminated our results in the community. This has already led to specific improvements at several CAs and revocation of mis-issued certificates. Furthermore, in this work, we suggest ways to improve the security impact of CAA. To foster further improvements and to practice reproducible research, we share raw data and analysis tools.
证书颁发机构授权(CAA)简介
近年来,由于受到严重威胁的影响,Web的公钥基础设施增加了几种安全机制。其中一种机制是证书颁发机构授权(CAA) DNS记录,它使域名持有者能够控制哪些证书颁发机构(ca)可以为其域颁发证书。首先在RFC 6844中定义,CA/B论坛的采用要求CA在2017年9月8日之前验证CAA记录。CAA的成功取决于三个参与者的行为:ca、域名持有者和DNS运营商。我们对他们的行为进行了实证研究,并观察到ca在发行实验中表现出不完整的遵守,域名持有人以令人鼓舞但容易出错的方式配置CAA记录,31家最大的DNS运营商中只有6家允许客户添加CAA记录。此外,使用历史CAA数据,我们发现了已经颁发的证书的异常情况。我们在社区中传播了我们的结果。这已经导致了几个ca的具体改进,并撤销了错误颁发的证书。此外,在本工作中,我们提出了提高CAA安全影响的方法。为了促进进一步的改进和实践可重复的研究,我们共享原始数据和分析工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信