Evidence for treatment of lower limb in-stent restenosis with drug eluting balloons.

Brian H Li, Y. Chan, Stephen W. K. Cheng
{"title":"Evidence for treatment of lower limb in-stent restenosis with drug eluting balloons.","authors":"Brian H Li, Y. Chan, Stephen W. K. Cheng","doi":"10.23736/S0021-9509.20.07968-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION\nRestenosis by myointimal hyperplasia after peripheral arterial angioplasty or stenting often limits long term patency. Drug-eluting balloons (DEBs) which inhibit the proliferation of neo-intimal growth of vascular smooth muscle cells may prevent restenosis. The aim of this paper was to examine the evidence in published literature on the use of DEBs in the treatment of peripheral arterial in-stent restenosis (ISR).\n\n\nEVIDENCE ACQUISITION\nA systematic literature review was undertaken of all published literature on the treatment of peripheral ISR with drug eluting balloon using Medline and cross-referenced. All published papers on the use of DEBs in peripheral arterial disease (PAD) were used. Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and electronic databases were also searched for on-going studies.\n\n\nEVIDENCE SYNTHESIS\nThere were no level 1 or 2 evidence published on this subject. The number of high-quality publications is few, and consequently a sufficient analysis is not possible. Recently data from non-randomized cohort studies showed encouraging results with DEB as treatment modality for ISR, whether used alone or as combined strategies.\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nEvidence from the published literature suggests that DEBs are safe in preventing peripheral ISR. Despite strong corporate pressure for the use of DEBs, there is only circumstantial evidence that this is a useful modality for ISR. Results from on-going studies may allow further meta-analysis for efficiency and cost-effectiveness.","PeriodicalId":101333,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of cardiovascular surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of cardiovascular surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0021-9509.20.07968-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

INTRODUCTION Restenosis by myointimal hyperplasia after peripheral arterial angioplasty or stenting often limits long term patency. Drug-eluting balloons (DEBs) which inhibit the proliferation of neo-intimal growth of vascular smooth muscle cells may prevent restenosis. The aim of this paper was to examine the evidence in published literature on the use of DEBs in the treatment of peripheral arterial in-stent restenosis (ISR). EVIDENCE ACQUISITION A systematic literature review was undertaken of all published literature on the treatment of peripheral ISR with drug eluting balloon using Medline and cross-referenced. All published papers on the use of DEBs in peripheral arterial disease (PAD) were used. Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and electronic databases were also searched for on-going studies. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS There were no level 1 or 2 evidence published on this subject. The number of high-quality publications is few, and consequently a sufficient analysis is not possible. Recently data from non-randomized cohort studies showed encouraging results with DEB as treatment modality for ISR, whether used alone or as combined strategies. CONCLUSIONS Evidence from the published literature suggests that DEBs are safe in preventing peripheral ISR. Despite strong corporate pressure for the use of DEBs, there is only circumstantial evidence that this is a useful modality for ISR. Results from on-going studies may allow further meta-analysis for efficiency and cost-effectiveness.
药物洗脱球囊治疗支架内下肢再狭窄的证据。
外周动脉血管成形术或支架植入术后由肌内膜增生引起的再狭窄常常限制长期通畅。药物洗脱球(DEBs)抑制血管平滑肌细胞新内膜生长的增殖,可预防再狭窄。本文的目的是检查已发表文献中关于使用DEBs治疗支架内动脉再狭窄(ISR)的证据。通过Medline和交叉参考,对所有已发表的药物洗脱球囊治疗外周ISR的文献进行了系统的文献综述。所有已发表的关于DEBs在外周动脉疾病(PAD)中的应用的论文均被使用。还检索了Cochrane中央对照试验注册库和电子数据库中正在进行的研究。证据综合:本课题未发表1级或2级证据。高质量出版物的数量很少,因此不可能进行充分的分析。最近来自非随机队列研究的数据显示,无论是单独使用还是联合使用,DEB作为ISR的治疗方式都取得了令人鼓舞的结果。结论来自已发表文献的证据表明,debb在预防外周ISR方面是安全的。尽管企业对使用deb施加了强大的压力,但只有间接证据表明这是一种有用的ISR模式。正在进行的研究结果可能允许对效率和成本效益进行进一步的荟萃分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信