Perkawinan Sejenis Dalam Presfektif Aliran Eksistensialisme Dikaitkan Dengan Hak Asasi Manusia

Otong Syuhada
{"title":"Perkawinan Sejenis Dalam Presfektif Aliran Eksistensialisme Dikaitkan Dengan Hak Asasi Manusia","authors":"Otong Syuhada","doi":"10.30596/dll.v4i1.3168","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A marriage is generally legalized in some countries for couples consisting of one male and one female. But similar marriage is a different matter. This type of marriage is often done between men and women and women. This marriage is considered as the right of the individual to shape his own life, so that anyone cannot forbid it, so does the existentialism flow which states that every individual is given the greatest freedom. Of course, this freedom makes an individual do things he thinks are right because it is from his own right as an individual. In HAM also states that the right to freedom of association contains elements of the right to freedom and social rights and freedom of religion shows the distinctive personal and collective rights, but if we examine it more deeply it is clear that freedom in question is freedom that has boundaries that must be met as well ; does it violate decency, religion, or the integrity of the nation? The purpose of this study is to find out same-sex marriage in the existentialism flow and to know the human rights perspective in criticizing same-sex marriage. This study uses a normative juridical approach and the nature of this research is descriptive analytical.","PeriodicalId":158962,"journal":{"name":"DE LEGA LATA: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"DE LEGA LATA: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30596/dll.v4i1.3168","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A marriage is generally legalized in some countries for couples consisting of one male and one female. But similar marriage is a different matter. This type of marriage is often done between men and women and women. This marriage is considered as the right of the individual to shape his own life, so that anyone cannot forbid it, so does the existentialism flow which states that every individual is given the greatest freedom. Of course, this freedom makes an individual do things he thinks are right because it is from his own right as an individual. In HAM also states that the right to freedom of association contains elements of the right to freedom and social rights and freedom of religion shows the distinctive personal and collective rights, but if we examine it more deeply it is clear that freedom in question is freedom that has boundaries that must be met as well ; does it violate decency, religion, or the integrity of the nation? The purpose of this study is to find out same-sex marriage in the existentialism flow and to know the human rights perspective in criticizing same-sex marriage. This study uses a normative juridical approach and the nature of this research is descriptive analytical.
存在主义学派中的同性婚姻与人权有关
在一些国家,由一男一女组成的婚姻通常是合法的。但类似的婚姻是另一回事。这种婚姻通常是在男人和女人之间进行的。这种婚姻被认为是个人塑造自己生活的权利,因此任何人都不能禁止它,存在主义也如此流动,它说每个人都被赋予最大的自由。当然,这种自由使个人做他认为正确的事情,因为这是他作为个人的权利。在HAM中也指出,结社自由权利包含了自由权利和社会权利的要素,宗教自由显示了独特的个人和集体权利,但如果我们更深入地研究它,很明显,所讨论的自由是有边界的自由,必须满足;它是否违反了礼仪、宗教或国家的完整性?本研究的目的在于找出存在主义思潮中的同性婚姻,并了解批判同性婚姻的人权视角。本研究采用规范的司法方法,本研究的性质是描述性分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信