Handling Imprecise Information in Emergency Psychiatric Care

Kristina Sygel, M. Danielson, L. Ekenberg, U. Fors
{"title":"Handling Imprecise Information in Emergency Psychiatric Care","authors":"Kristina Sygel, M. Danielson, L. Ekenberg, U. Fors","doi":"10.3233/978-1-61499-522-7-250","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Decision analytical methods have been utilized and demonstrated to be of use for a broad range of applications in medical contexts, from regular diagnostic strategies and treatment to the evaluation of diagnostic tests and prediction models and benefit-risk assessments. However, a number of issues still remain to be clarified, for instance ease of use, realism of the input data, long-term outcomes and integration into routine clinical work. In particular, it is questionable whether clinicians are capable of providing the specific and high-quality input data that many of the prevailing methods require, since there is very often a lack of complete and precise background information. This is not least the case within psychiatric emergency care where the information available often is of a highly qualitative nature, but there is nevertheless a need for deliberate decisions. This article demonstrates, using a fictive but perfectly realistic case, show a decision support system can be useful in recommending courses of action within psychiatric emergency situations requiring rapid decisions despite a lack of complete and precise information.","PeriodicalId":127449,"journal":{"name":"International Conference on System Science and Engineering","volume":"104 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Conference on System Science and Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-61499-522-7-250","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Decision analytical methods have been utilized and demonstrated to be of use for a broad range of applications in medical contexts, from regular diagnostic strategies and treatment to the evaluation of diagnostic tests and prediction models and benefit-risk assessments. However, a number of issues still remain to be clarified, for instance ease of use, realism of the input data, long-term outcomes and integration into routine clinical work. In particular, it is questionable whether clinicians are capable of providing the specific and high-quality input data that many of the prevailing methods require, since there is very often a lack of complete and precise background information. This is not least the case within psychiatric emergency care where the information available often is of a highly qualitative nature, but there is nevertheless a need for deliberate decisions. This article demonstrates, using a fictive but perfectly realistic case, show a decision support system can be useful in recommending courses of action within psychiatric emergency situations requiring rapid decisions despite a lack of complete and precise information.
在紧急精神病学护理中处理不准确的信息
决策分析方法已得到利用,并被证明可用于医学领域的广泛应用,从常规诊断战略和治疗到诊断测试和预测模型的评价以及利益-风险评估。然而,许多问题仍有待澄清,例如易用性、输入数据的真实性、长期结果以及与常规临床工作的整合。尤其值得怀疑的是,临床医生是否有能力提供许多主流方法所需的具体和高质量的输入数据,因为通常缺乏完整和精确的背景信息。在精神科急诊护理中尤其如此,在这种情况下,可获得的信息往往是高度定性的,但仍然需要深思熟虑地作出决定。本文通过一个真实的案例,展示了决策支持系统在缺乏完整和精确信息的情况下,在需要快速决策的精神病学紧急情况下,可以有效地推荐行动方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信