Drill-Off Tests for Drilling Optimization: Pitfalls and How to Avoid Them

Khim Chhantyal, Å. Kyllingstad, Anders Hetland, Kjartan Thor Birgisson
{"title":"Drill-Off Tests for Drilling Optimization: Pitfalls and How to Avoid Them","authors":"Khim Chhantyal, Å. Kyllingstad, Anders Hetland, Kjartan Thor Birgisson","doi":"10.2118/212478-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n A drill-off test is a special drilling test where the drawworks is locked and the string elasticity causes the bit to penetrate the formation at a decreasing weight on bit (WOB). It is often used as a tool for finding how the rate of penetration (ROP) varies as a function of WOB and for finding optimal drilling parameters. This paper sheds a critical light on the use of drill-off test by discussing various errors and pitfalls usually ignored today. The paper starts by presenting a simple but widely used method for converting surface hookload data into an ROP vs. WOB curve, commonly known as a drilling performance curve. Next, it discusses and tries to quantify various error sources, such as hookload sensor errors, residual wellbore drag, and formation inhomogeneities. The paper uses real field data and a comprehensive simulation model to illustrate the magnitude of the various errors and how they affect the drilling performance curve. Finally, the paper suggests ways to check the accuracy and validity of the drill-off tests. The analysis shows that the variable wellbore friction is an error source that depends on many parameters, such as string length, wellbore inclination, rotational string speed, and ROP. It also shows that it is possible to model the errors and apply correction formulas to improve the quality and accuracy of WOB and ROP. Although friction-related errors can be reduced by applying proper corrections to the estimated WOB and ROP, there is still a need to check the validity of the drill-off test results with other types of drilling tests. The paper presents several proposals for alternative and complementary drilling tests, such as drill-on test (here defined as a test where WOB is continuously increased), steady state (constant WOB) drilling test, combo test, and sinusoidal perturbations test.","PeriodicalId":103776,"journal":{"name":"Day 2 Wed, March 08, 2023","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 2 Wed, March 08, 2023","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/212478-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A drill-off test is a special drilling test where the drawworks is locked and the string elasticity causes the bit to penetrate the formation at a decreasing weight on bit (WOB). It is often used as a tool for finding how the rate of penetration (ROP) varies as a function of WOB and for finding optimal drilling parameters. This paper sheds a critical light on the use of drill-off test by discussing various errors and pitfalls usually ignored today. The paper starts by presenting a simple but widely used method for converting surface hookload data into an ROP vs. WOB curve, commonly known as a drilling performance curve. Next, it discusses and tries to quantify various error sources, such as hookload sensor errors, residual wellbore drag, and formation inhomogeneities. The paper uses real field data and a comprehensive simulation model to illustrate the magnitude of the various errors and how they affect the drilling performance curve. Finally, the paper suggests ways to check the accuracy and validity of the drill-off tests. The analysis shows that the variable wellbore friction is an error source that depends on many parameters, such as string length, wellbore inclination, rotational string speed, and ROP. It also shows that it is possible to model the errors and apply correction formulas to improve the quality and accuracy of WOB and ROP. Although friction-related errors can be reduced by applying proper corrections to the estimated WOB and ROP, there is still a need to check the validity of the drill-off test results with other types of drilling tests. The paper presents several proposals for alternative and complementary drilling tests, such as drill-on test (here defined as a test where WOB is continuously increased), steady state (constant WOB) drilling test, combo test, and sinusoidal perturbations test.
钻井优化的钻脱试验:陷阱及如何避免
钻脱测试是一种特殊的钻井测试,其中绞车被锁住,钻柱的弹性使钻头在钻压(WOB)下降的情况下穿透地层。它通常被用作发现机械钻速(ROP)随钻压变化的函数以及寻找最佳钻井参数的工具。本文通过讨论当今通常被忽视的各种错误和陷阱,对钻取测试的使用进行了批判性的阐述。本文首先介绍了一种简单但广泛使用的方法,将地面钩载荷数据转换为ROP / WOB曲线,通常称为钻井性能曲线。接下来,讨论并尝试量化各种误差源,如钩载传感器误差、残余井筒阻力和地层不均匀性。本文利用实际现场数据和综合仿真模型来说明各种误差的大小及其对钻井性能曲线的影响。最后,提出了验证钻脱试验准确性和有效性的方法。分析表明,变化的井筒摩擦是一个误差源,它取决于许多参数,如管柱长度、井筒倾角、管柱旋转速度和ROP。结果表明,对误差进行建模并应用修正公式来提高钻压和钻速的质量和精度是可能的。虽然可以通过对估计的钻压和机械钻速进行适当的修正来减少与摩擦相关的误差,但仍然需要与其他类型的钻井测试一起检查钻脱测试结果的有效性。本文提出了几种替代和补充钻井测试的建议,如钻上测试(此处定义为钻压不断增加的测试)、稳态(恒定钻压)钻井测试、组合测试和正弦扰动测试。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信