Ethics Pedagogy 2.0: A Content Analysis of Award-Winning Media Ethics Exercises

Carol B. Schwalbe, David Cuillier
{"title":"Ethics Pedagogy 2.0: A Content Analysis of Award-Winning Media Ethics Exercises","authors":"Carol B. Schwalbe, David Cuillier","doi":"10.1080/08900523.2013.795058","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A content analysis of 253 Great Ideas for Teachers (GIFTs) found that most of the 18 activities suitable for ethics courses relied on traditional methods of teaching, mainly discussions, teamwork, and case studies. Few used online technology, games, or simulations, compared with activities in other areas of journalism education. While most ethics ideas were designed to stimulate higher order learning, they were less likely than other GIFTs to incorporate varied elements that might improve student engagement. The authors make suggestions, based on the education literature and GIFT analysis, for incorporating dynamic, interactive activities in ethics courses.","PeriodicalId":162833,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Mass Media Ethics","volume":"53 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Mass Media Ethics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08900523.2013.795058","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

A content analysis of 253 Great Ideas for Teachers (GIFTs) found that most of the 18 activities suitable for ethics courses relied on traditional methods of teaching, mainly discussions, teamwork, and case studies. Few used online technology, games, or simulations, compared with activities in other areas of journalism education. While most ethics ideas were designed to stimulate higher order learning, they were less likely than other GIFTs to incorporate varied elements that might improve student engagement. The authors make suggestions, based on the education literature and GIFT analysis, for incorporating dynamic, interactive activities in ethics courses.
伦理教育学2.0:获奖媒体伦理练习的内容分析
《253个给教师的好主意(gift)》的内容分析发现,18项适合伦理课程的活动中,大多数都依赖于传统的教学方法,主要是讨论、团队合作和案例研究。与其他新闻教育领域的活动相比,很少有人使用在线技术、游戏或模拟。虽然大多数道德观念都是为了刺激更高层次的学习而设计的,但与其他礼物相比,它们不太可能包含可能提高学生参与度的各种元素。基于教育文献和GIFT分析,笔者提出了在伦理学课程中引入动态互动活动的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信