VAS Scores, Pain-Free Duration, Range of Motion, and IL-6 Levels are Better in Adductor Canal Block Compared to Genicular Nerve Block in Patients with Chronic Pain of Degenerative Disease of the Knee Joint

I. Prasada, I. Dusak, I. W. Aryana, I. A. Wiguna, I. Suyasa
{"title":"VAS Scores, Pain-Free Duration, Range of Motion, and IL-6 Levels are Better in Adductor Canal Block Compared to Genicular Nerve Block in Patients with Chronic Pain of Degenerative Disease of the Knee Joint","authors":"I. Prasada, I. Dusak, I. W. Aryana, I. A. Wiguna, I. Suyasa","doi":"10.24018/ejmed.2023.5.2.1707","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nIntroduction: Chronic knee pain is the leading cause of functional limitations in the older age group and accounts for many visits to health care providers. This degenerative condition is progressive with functional impairment and a severe decrease in quality of life. Pain management with Adductor Canal Block (ACB) and Genicular Nerve Block (GNB) can be an alternative treatment option for chronic knee pain. This study aims to analyze the difference between clinical & laboratory outcomes of the ACB and GNB groups. \n\n\nMaterial & Methods: An experimental study with consecutive sampling was conducted on 34 patients with chronic knee pain divided into 2 groups of ACB and GNB procedures. The parameters measured were VAS score, pain-free duration, range of motion, and interleukin-6 (IL-6) levels. \n\n\nResults: Predominance of chronic knee pain patients found in older women. Based on statistical analysis, there was an improvement in VAS scores (p<0,05), a similar pain-free duration (p>0,05), an improvement in the range of motion (p<0,05), and a decrease in IL-6 levels (p<0,05) significantly in the ACB group compared to GNB. \n\n\nConclusion: ACB can be used as an effective therapy in treating chronic knee pain.\n","PeriodicalId":113708,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Medical and Health Sciences","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Medical and Health Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24018/ejmed.2023.5.2.1707","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Chronic knee pain is the leading cause of functional limitations in the older age group and accounts for many visits to health care providers. This degenerative condition is progressive with functional impairment and a severe decrease in quality of life. Pain management with Adductor Canal Block (ACB) and Genicular Nerve Block (GNB) can be an alternative treatment option for chronic knee pain. This study aims to analyze the difference between clinical & laboratory outcomes of the ACB and GNB groups. Material & Methods: An experimental study with consecutive sampling was conducted on 34 patients with chronic knee pain divided into 2 groups of ACB and GNB procedures. The parameters measured were VAS score, pain-free duration, range of motion, and interleukin-6 (IL-6) levels. Results: Predominance of chronic knee pain patients found in older women. Based on statistical analysis, there was an improvement in VAS scores (p<0,05), a similar pain-free duration (p>0,05), an improvement in the range of motion (p<0,05), and a decrease in IL-6 levels (p<0,05) significantly in the ACB group compared to GNB. Conclusion: ACB can be used as an effective therapy in treating chronic knee pain.
膝关节退行性慢性疼痛患者的VAS评分、无痛持续时间、活动范围和IL-6水平,内收管阻滞优于膝神经阻滞
慢性膝关节疼痛是老年人功能限制的主要原因,也是许多人就诊的原因。这种退行性疾病是进行性的,伴有功能损害和生活质量的严重下降。疼痛管理与内收管阻滞(ACB)和膝神经阻滞(GNB)可以替代治疗慢性膝关节疼痛的选择。本研究旨在分析ACB组和GNB组临床和实验室结果的差异。材料与方法:对34例慢性膝关节疼痛患者进行连续抽样实验研究,分为ACB和GNB两组。测量的参数包括VAS评分、无痛持续时间、活动范围和白细胞介素-6 (IL-6)水平。结果:慢性膝关节疼痛患者以老年女性居多。经统计学分析,与GNB组比较,ACB组VAS评分改善(p0,05),活动范围改善(p< 0.05), IL-6水平降低(p< 0.05)。结论:ACB是治疗慢性膝关节疼痛的有效方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信