Evaluating the energy-efficiency of key exchange protocols in wirelesssensor networks

Christian Haas, J. Wilke
{"title":"Evaluating the energy-efficiency of key exchange protocols in wirelesssensor networks","authors":"Christian Haas, J. Wilke","doi":"10.1145/2387191.2387210","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The evaluation of the energy-efficiency of applications and protocols is one of the most important issues in Wireless Sensor Networks (WSN). However, this is a time consuming and challenging task. Therefore, a realistic energy-efficiency evaluation is often neglected or oversimplified by using simple theoretical models or unsuited simulation tools. In this work, we evaluate the energy-efficiency of two specific key exchange protocols, an Elliptic Curve Diffie-Hellman with authentication (ECDH-ECDSA) and a Kerberos based approach, while using different duty-cycling MAC layer protocols. In our evaluation, we compare the results from a theoretical model with simulation results using the AVRORA+ simulation tool and real-world measurements in our WSN testbed SANDbed. Using three MAC layer protocols, TinyOS built in Low-Power-Listening as well as S-MAC and standard 802.15.4, we show that there are several important cross-layer effects that should be considered when performing an energy-efficiency evaluation. Furthermore, we argue, that there are several evaluation metrics like the absolute energy consumption per key exchange or one key exchange per measured time interval.","PeriodicalId":311005,"journal":{"name":"International Workshop on Performance Monitoring, Measurement, and Evaluation of Heterogeneous Wireless and Wired Networks","volume":"54 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Workshop on Performance Monitoring, Measurement, and Evaluation of Heterogeneous Wireless and Wired Networks","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2387191.2387210","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

The evaluation of the energy-efficiency of applications and protocols is one of the most important issues in Wireless Sensor Networks (WSN). However, this is a time consuming and challenging task. Therefore, a realistic energy-efficiency evaluation is often neglected or oversimplified by using simple theoretical models or unsuited simulation tools. In this work, we evaluate the energy-efficiency of two specific key exchange protocols, an Elliptic Curve Diffie-Hellman with authentication (ECDH-ECDSA) and a Kerberos based approach, while using different duty-cycling MAC layer protocols. In our evaluation, we compare the results from a theoretical model with simulation results using the AVRORA+ simulation tool and real-world measurements in our WSN testbed SANDbed. Using three MAC layer protocols, TinyOS built in Low-Power-Listening as well as S-MAC and standard 802.15.4, we show that there are several important cross-layer effects that should be considered when performing an energy-efficiency evaluation. Furthermore, we argue, that there are several evaluation metrics like the absolute energy consumption per key exchange or one key exchange per measured time interval.
无线传感器网络中密钥交换协议的能效评估
应用和协议的能效评估是无线传感器网络(WSN)中最重要的问题之一。然而,这是一项耗时且具有挑战性的任务。因此,使用简单的理论模型或不合适的仿真工具,往往会忽略或过度简化现实的能源效率评估。在这项工作中,我们评估了两种特定密钥交换协议的能效,椭圆曲线Diffie-Hellman带身份验证(ECDH-ECDSA)和基于Kerberos的方法,同时使用不同的占空比MAC层协议。在我们的评估中,我们将理论模型的结果与使用AVRORA+仿真工具的仿真结果以及WSN测试平台SANDbed上的实际测量结果进行了比较。使用三种MAC层协议,TinyOS内置低功耗侦听以及S-MAC和标准802.15.4,我们表明在执行能效评估时应该考虑几个重要的跨层效应。此外,我们认为,有几个评估指标,如每次密钥交换的绝对能耗或每个测量时间间隔的一次密钥交换。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信