From Accumulation to Alienation: Marx and Veblen

{"title":"From Accumulation to Alienation: Marx and Veblen","authors":"","doi":"10.16997/book16.e","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The previous chapter discussed some of the features of social capitalism and the nature of these flexible and mobile regimes to gain insight into the phenomenon of accumulation that occurs on social media, particularly with a view to online social capital’s most readily apparent symbol: numeric counters that validate, valorise, and give some semblance of value to user production on social media. This is paired with the way social media sites accumulate and aggregate user data for its own purposes, not for the benefit of the user. Both of these forms of accumulation are not only circuits unto themselves, but are linked. To what degree users on social media are alienated and exploited through their acts of online social capital accumulation must be answered in light of the specific affordances of social media, while also drawing from the works of Marx and Veblen. Given this chapter’s focus on alienation and exploitation, appealing to the works of Marx would be an obvious choice; however, this will only represent part of the story, for there is also the institutional economic approach developed by Thorstein Veblen that may speak to social media users’ conspicuous acts online. Combined, this will tell a more dynamic story about how alienation and exploitation manifest in the pursuit of online social capital. Both Marx and Veblen will agree that alienation is a major issue to be addressed and ameliorated, despite being in disagreement about its origins. For Marx, a raising of class consciousness is key to superseding alienation and exploitation, whereas for Veblen it is to wrest the power of invention and creation away from purely pecuniary interests, but also to raise consciousness in a different way: to get people to question their own conspicuous consumption and ritualistic behaviour. In the simplest of terms, the way out of alienation and exploitation leads, for Marx, to the classless society where workers own the means of production; for Veblen, to a society where education and technology will not be","PeriodicalId":275248,"journal":{"name":"Social Capital Online: Alienation and Accumulation","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Capital Online: Alienation and Accumulation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.16997/book16.e","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The previous chapter discussed some of the features of social capitalism and the nature of these flexible and mobile regimes to gain insight into the phenomenon of accumulation that occurs on social media, particularly with a view to online social capital’s most readily apparent symbol: numeric counters that validate, valorise, and give some semblance of value to user production on social media. This is paired with the way social media sites accumulate and aggregate user data for its own purposes, not for the benefit of the user. Both of these forms of accumulation are not only circuits unto themselves, but are linked. To what degree users on social media are alienated and exploited through their acts of online social capital accumulation must be answered in light of the specific affordances of social media, while also drawing from the works of Marx and Veblen. Given this chapter’s focus on alienation and exploitation, appealing to the works of Marx would be an obvious choice; however, this will only represent part of the story, for there is also the institutional economic approach developed by Thorstein Veblen that may speak to social media users’ conspicuous acts online. Combined, this will tell a more dynamic story about how alienation and exploitation manifest in the pursuit of online social capital. Both Marx and Veblen will agree that alienation is a major issue to be addressed and ameliorated, despite being in disagreement about its origins. For Marx, a raising of class consciousness is key to superseding alienation and exploitation, whereas for Veblen it is to wrest the power of invention and creation away from purely pecuniary interests, but also to raise consciousness in a different way: to get people to question their own conspicuous consumption and ritualistic behaviour. In the simplest of terms, the way out of alienation and exploitation leads, for Marx, to the classless society where workers own the means of production; for Veblen, to a society where education and technology will not be
从积累到异化:马克思与凡勃伦
前一章讨论了社会资本主义的一些特征,以及这些灵活和流动的制度的本质,以深入了解社交媒体上发生的积累现象,特别是针对在线社会资本最明显的象征:数字计数器,它验证、估值,并为社交媒体上的用户生产提供了一些价值。这与社交媒体网站为自己的目的而不是为用户的利益而积累和汇总用户数据的方式相匹配。这两种形式的积累不仅互为回路,而且是相互联系的。社交媒体上的用户通过其在线社会资本积累的行为,在多大程度上被异化和剥削,必须根据社交媒体的具体启示来回答,同时也要借鉴马克思和凡勃伦的著作。鉴于本章的重点是异化和剥削,诉诸马克思的著作将是一个明显的选择;然而,这只是故事的一部分,因为索尔斯坦·凡勃伦(Thorstein Veblen)提出的制度经济学方法也可以解释社交媒体用户在网上的引人注目的行为。结合起来,这将讲述一个更有活力的故事,讲述在追求网络社会资本的过程中,异化和剥削是如何表现出来的。马克思和凡勃伦都同意,异化是一个需要解决和改善的主要问题,尽管他们对异化的起源存在分歧。对马克思来说,阶级意识的提高是取代异化和剥削的关键,而对凡勃伦来说,这是要从纯粹的金钱利益中夺取发明和创造的力量,但也要以另一种方式提高意识:让人们质疑自己的炫耀性消费和仪式性行为。用最简单的话来说,对马克思来说,摆脱异化和剥削的出路是通向无阶级社会,在那里工人拥有生产资料;对凡勃伦来说,这是一个没有教育和技术的社会
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信