How Did Robert Grosseteste and Thomas Aquinas Read Anselm’s Definition of Truth?

Christian Brouwer, Robert Grosseteste
{"title":"How Did Robert Grosseteste and Thomas Aquinas Read Anselm’s Definition of Truth?","authors":"Christian Brouwer, Robert Grosseteste","doi":"10.1163/9789004468238_013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the first chapter of his De veritate (ca. 1080-1086), Anselm suggests he has a place in the history of the concept of truth. The task to find a definition for truth didn’t seem to have been done before. 1 Anselm’s definition may not only be an event in the philosophical history of truth, but it became also an authority for many thinkers in the following times. In this paper, I will examine two stages of its use by two famous thinkers, both of them of great historical importance. Robert Grosseteste (ca. 1168-1253) is renowned for his many scientific tracts, his commentaries of Aristotle (among the first ones ever) and some very original positions about light. He is contemporary of the beginnings of Franciscan tradition which he influenced. On the other hand, it is not necessary to stress the importance of Thomas Aquinas (1225-1274) in medieval thought in general, and especially in Dominican tradition. Both authors read Anselm’s definition in different ways and contexts, testifying to its role as revealing thought orientations.","PeriodicalId":120839,"journal":{"name":"Anselm of Canterbury: Communities, Contemporaries and Criticism","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anselm of Canterbury: Communities, Contemporaries and Criticism","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004468238_013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the first chapter of his De veritate (ca. 1080-1086), Anselm suggests he has a place in the history of the concept of truth. The task to find a definition for truth didn’t seem to have been done before. 1 Anselm’s definition may not only be an event in the philosophical history of truth, but it became also an authority for many thinkers in the following times. In this paper, I will examine two stages of its use by two famous thinkers, both of them of great historical importance. Robert Grosseteste (ca. 1168-1253) is renowned for his many scientific tracts, his commentaries of Aristotle (among the first ones ever) and some very original positions about light. He is contemporary of the beginnings of Franciscan tradition which he influenced. On the other hand, it is not necessary to stress the importance of Thomas Aquinas (1225-1274) in medieval thought in general, and especially in Dominican tradition. Both authors read Anselm’s definition in different ways and contexts, testifying to its role as revealing thought orientations.
罗伯特·格罗斯泰斯特和托马斯·阿奎那如何解读安塞尔姆对真理的定义?
在他的《论真理》(De veritate,约1080-1086)的第一章中,Anselm暗示他在真理概念的历史中占有一席之地。为真理寻找定义的任务似乎以前没有人做过。1安塞尔姆的定义不仅可能是真理哲学史上的一个事件,而且也成为后来许多思想家的权威。在本文中,我将考察两位著名思想家使用它的两个阶段,他们都具有重要的历史意义。罗伯特·格罗斯泰斯特(Robert Grosseteste,约1168-1253年)以他的许多科学著作、对亚里士多德的评论(有史以来最早的评论之一)和一些关于光的非常原创的观点而闻名。他是当代的方济会传统的开端,他的影响。另一方面,没有必要强调托马斯·阿奎那(1225-1274)在中世纪思想中的重要性,特别是在多米尼加传统中。两位作者以不同的方式和语境解读了安塞尔姆的定义,证明了它作为揭示思想取向的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信