Contracting strategies for generation companies with ambiguity aversion on spot price distribution

Bruno Fanzeres, A. Street, L. Barroso
{"title":"Contracting strategies for generation companies with ambiguity aversion on spot price distribution","authors":"Bruno Fanzeres, A. Street, L. Barroso","doi":"10.1109/PSCC.2014.7038448","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Energy spot price is characterized by its high volatility and difficult prediction, representing a major risk for energy companies, especially those that rely on renewable generation. The typical approach employed by such companies to address their mid- and long-term optimal contracting strategy is to simulate a large set of paths for the uncertainty factors to characterize the probability distribution of the future income and, then, optimize the company portfolio to maximize its certainty equivalent. In practice, however, spot price modeling and simulation is a big challenge for agents due to its high dependence on parameters that are difficult to predict, e.g., GDP growth, demand variation, entrance of new market players, regulatory changes, just to name a few. Under this framework, decisions are made under ambiguity, which happens whenever the decision maker is aware that a given set of scenarios and probabilities represent only an approximation of the true underlying distribution. In this work, robust optimization is used to account for ambiguity aversion in the optimal contracting strategy of renewable generation companies. A case study with data from the Brazilian system is shown to illustrate the applicability of the proposed methodology.","PeriodicalId":155801,"journal":{"name":"2014 Power Systems Computation Conference","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2014 Power Systems Computation Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/PSCC.2014.7038448","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

Energy spot price is characterized by its high volatility and difficult prediction, representing a major risk for energy companies, especially those that rely on renewable generation. The typical approach employed by such companies to address their mid- and long-term optimal contracting strategy is to simulate a large set of paths for the uncertainty factors to characterize the probability distribution of the future income and, then, optimize the company portfolio to maximize its certainty equivalent. In practice, however, spot price modeling and simulation is a big challenge for agents due to its high dependence on parameters that are difficult to predict, e.g., GDP growth, demand variation, entrance of new market players, regulatory changes, just to name a few. Under this framework, decisions are made under ambiguity, which happens whenever the decision maker is aware that a given set of scenarios and probabilities represent only an approximation of the true underlying distribution. In this work, robust optimization is used to account for ambiguity aversion in the optimal contracting strategy of renewable generation companies. A case study with data from the Brazilian system is shown to illustrate the applicability of the proposed methodology.
具有现货价格分配歧义规避的发电公司合约策略
能源现货价格具有高波动性和难以预测的特点,这对能源公司来说是一个重大风险,尤其是那些依赖可再生能源发电的公司。这些公司解决其中长期最优合同策略的典型方法是,模拟不确定性因素的大量路径,以表征未来收入的概率分布,然后优化公司投资组合,使其确定性当量最大化。然而,在实践中,现货价格建模和模拟对代理商来说是一个很大的挑战,因为它高度依赖于难以预测的参数,例如GDP增长、需求变化、新市场参与者的进入、监管变化等等。在这个框架下,决策是在模棱两可的情况下做出的,当决策者意识到给定的一组场景和概率只代表了真实潜在分布的近似值时,就会发生这种情况。在这项工作中,鲁棒优化用于考虑可再生能源发电公司最优合同策略中的歧义规避。用巴西系统的数据进行个案研究,以说明所建议方法的适用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信