Introduction to High-Impact Feminist Pedagogies: Points of Encounter, Tactics of Change
April Lidinsky, T. C. Jespersen, Rachel E. Stein, Katie Hogan
{"title":"Introduction to High-Impact Feminist Pedagogies: Points of Encounter, Tactics of Change","authors":"April Lidinsky, T. C. Jespersen, Rachel E. Stein, Katie Hogan","doi":"10.5406/FEMTEACHER.24.3.0207","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"© 2015 by the board of trustees of the university of ill inois This four-paper cluster takes up bell hooks’s challenge in “Theory as a Liberatory Practice” to dismantle the perceived dichotomy between theory and practice. We analyze specific theory-based feminist pedagogical practices, which we employ on four very different campuses with four content areas (general education, body politics, environmental studies, and women’s history) that engage with students’ frequent (and understandable) resistance to feminism’s unsettling work. Drawing upon theorists such as Kuh, Zeilinger, Alaimo and Heckman, and others, our courses use “high-impact practices” (HIPs) that invite students to “walk the (feminist) walk” through exercises in collaborative learning, role-playing and identification, material alterations and corporeal actions, and re-inventing daily tactics. These high-engagement classroom activities anticipate preconceptions students bring to our classrooms, support them as they enact often unsettling critiques of hegemony, and provide contexts in which they can “come closer” to feminist histories and communities as they discover the pleasures of feminist engagement. Through our analysis of pedagogical strategies, we argue that an analytic understanding of ideology is insufficient in effecting change. “Doing” feminism, then, means crafting goals and assignments that challenge and inspire students as they take risks with intellectual and material engagement with feminism within and beyond the classroom. Such practices are consistent with the increasing national demand for colleges to foster active student engagement, to use “high-impact” transformational learning for student retention and success, and to cultivate empowered personhood and citizenship. teaching cluster","PeriodicalId":287450,"journal":{"name":"Feminist Teacher","volume":"62 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Feminist Teacher","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5406/FEMTEACHER.24.3.0207","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
© 2015 by the board of trustees of the university of ill inois This four-paper cluster takes up bell hooks’s challenge in “Theory as a Liberatory Practice” to dismantle the perceived dichotomy between theory and practice. We analyze specific theory-based feminist pedagogical practices, which we employ on four very different campuses with four content areas (general education, body politics, environmental studies, and women’s history) that engage with students’ frequent (and understandable) resistance to feminism’s unsettling work. Drawing upon theorists such as Kuh, Zeilinger, Alaimo and Heckman, and others, our courses use “high-impact practices” (HIPs) that invite students to “walk the (feminist) walk” through exercises in collaborative learning, role-playing and identification, material alterations and corporeal actions, and re-inventing daily tactics. These high-engagement classroom activities anticipate preconceptions students bring to our classrooms, support them as they enact often unsettling critiques of hegemony, and provide contexts in which they can “come closer” to feminist histories and communities as they discover the pleasures of feminist engagement. Through our analysis of pedagogical strategies, we argue that an analytic understanding of ideology is insufficient in effecting change. “Doing” feminism, then, means crafting goals and assignments that challenge and inspire students as they take risks with intellectual and material engagement with feminism within and beyond the classroom. Such practices are consistent with the increasing national demand for colleges to foster active student engagement, to use “high-impact” transformational learning for student retention and success, and to cultivate empowered personhood and citizenship. teaching cluster
高影响力女权主义教学法导论:相遇点,变革策略
这个四篇论文的集群接受了bell hooks在“理论作为解放实践”中的挑战,以消除理论与实践之间的二分法。我们分析了具体的基于理论的女权主义教学实践,我们在四个非常不同的校园采用了四个内容领域(通识教育,身体政治,环境研究和女性历史),这些领域涉及学生对女权主义令人不安的工作的频繁(和可以理解的)抵制。借鉴Kuh、Zeilinger、Alaimo和Heckman等理论家的理论,我们的课程采用“高影响力实践”(HIPs),邀请学生通过合作学习、角色扮演和识别、物质改变和身体行动以及重新发明日常策略等练习来“走(女权主义)之路”。这些高参与度的课堂活动预测了学生带到课堂上的先入之见,支持他们对霸权主义进行令人不安的批评,并提供了环境,让他们在发现女权主义参与的乐趣时,可以“更接近”女权主义的历史和社区。通过对教学策略的分析,我们认为对意识形态的分析理解不足以影响变革。因此,“实践”女权主义意味着制定目标和任务,挑战和激励学生,因为他们在课堂内外冒险与女权主义进行智力和物质上的接触。这种做法与国家对大学不断增长的需求是一致的,即促进学生的积极参与,使用“高影响力”的转型学习来促进学生的保留和成功,并培养强大的人格和公民意识。教学集群
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。