Physical and Psychological Violence against Married Men in District Dir (Lower), Khyber Pukhtoonkhwa, Pakistan

H. Khan, T. Ali, Aamir Abdullah, S. Shahid
{"title":"Physical and Psychological Violence against Married Men in District Dir (Lower), Khyber Pukhtoonkhwa, Pakistan","authors":"H. Khan, T. Ali, Aamir Abdullah, S. Shahid","doi":"10.31031/cojnh.2018.03.000556","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The World Health Organization [1] has defined violence as “the intentional use of physical force, threatened or actual, against oneself, another person, or against a group or community, that either results in, or has a high likelihood of resulting in injury, death, psychological harm, mal-development or deprivation’’ [1]. According to the WHO [1] typology of violence, there are mainly three types, such as, self-directed, interpersonal, and collective violence; these types are further divided into subtypes [1]. The current study focused on interpersonal (intimate partner or domestic) violence against married men. The Intimate Partner Violence (IPV) can be defined as the physical, psychological, or sexual harm by current/previous partner or spouse; domestic violence is used interchangeably with IPVs [2]. Violence against women is extensively studied in different parts of the western world and Asian countries; however, very few of the researchers have paid attention towards violence against men [3,4]; Hines et al. [5] it is commonly claimed that men are traditionally viewed as being physically stronger than women, therefore, they under-report their victimization due to barriers like embarrassment and masculine ego [6]. The fact that men are victims of IPV, from their female partners, has been identified for the last thirty years [5]; these victims often face the humiliation of being laughed at, accused, belittled, or ridiculed, due to which they do not report their victimization [6]. Studies have identified equal levels of exposure to intimate partner violence among men and women [7]; the rates and frequencies of violence enacted by women are often similar to that of their men partners [8]. Such symmetry signifies a weak association of gender with perpetration of IPV. However, men’s ego has been developed by the society in such a way that their reporting of violence is generally considered a social stigma. When men attempt to report DV against them, most of the times they are not trusted; instead, they are laughed at and ridiculed for the notion that they are beaten by their wives","PeriodicalId":356179,"journal":{"name":"COJ Nursing & Healthcare","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"COJ Nursing & Healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31031/cojnh.2018.03.000556","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The World Health Organization [1] has defined violence as “the intentional use of physical force, threatened or actual, against oneself, another person, or against a group or community, that either results in, or has a high likelihood of resulting in injury, death, psychological harm, mal-development or deprivation’’ [1]. According to the WHO [1] typology of violence, there are mainly three types, such as, self-directed, interpersonal, and collective violence; these types are further divided into subtypes [1]. The current study focused on interpersonal (intimate partner or domestic) violence against married men. The Intimate Partner Violence (IPV) can be defined as the physical, psychological, or sexual harm by current/previous partner or spouse; domestic violence is used interchangeably with IPVs [2]. Violence against women is extensively studied in different parts of the western world and Asian countries; however, very few of the researchers have paid attention towards violence against men [3,4]; Hines et al. [5] it is commonly claimed that men are traditionally viewed as being physically stronger than women, therefore, they under-report their victimization due to barriers like embarrassment and masculine ego [6]. The fact that men are victims of IPV, from their female partners, has been identified for the last thirty years [5]; these victims often face the humiliation of being laughed at, accused, belittled, or ridiculed, due to which they do not report their victimization [6]. Studies have identified equal levels of exposure to intimate partner violence among men and women [7]; the rates and frequencies of violence enacted by women are often similar to that of their men partners [8]. Such symmetry signifies a weak association of gender with perpetration of IPV. However, men’s ego has been developed by the society in such a way that their reporting of violence is generally considered a social stigma. When men attempt to report DV against them, most of the times they are not trusted; instead, they are laughed at and ridiculed for the notion that they are beaten by their wives
巴基斯坦开伯尔普赫图赫瓦区(下)对已婚男子的身体和心理暴力
世界卫生组织将暴力定义为"对自己、他人或对一个群体或社区故意使用武力,威胁使用或实际使用,造成或极有可能造成伤害、死亡、心理伤害、发育不良或剥夺"。根据世界卫生组织[1]暴力类型,主要有三种类型,如自我导向、人际暴力和集体暴力;这些类型进一步分为[1]亚型。目前的研究重点是针对已婚男性的人际(亲密伴侣或家庭)暴力。亲密伴侣暴力(IPV)可以定义为现任/前任伴侣或配偶的身体、心理或性伤害;家庭暴力与IPVs的[2]互换使用。在西方世界和亚洲国家的不同地区,对妇女的暴力行为进行了广泛的研究;然而,很少有研究人员关注针对男性的暴力行为[3,4];Hines等人[6]0人们普遍认为,传统上认为男性在身体上比女性更强壮,因此,由于尴尬和男性自负等障碍,他们低估了自己的受害情况[6]。男性是IPV的受害者,来自于他们的女性伴侣,这一事实在过去的30年里已经被确认。这些受害者经常面临被嘲笑、指控、贬低或嘲笑的羞辱,因此他们不会报告自己的受害情况。研究发现,男性和女性遭受亲密伴侣暴力的程度相同[10];妇女实施暴力的比率和频率往往与她们的男性伴侣相似。这种对称性表明性别与IPV的发生有微弱的联系。然而,男性的自我被社会发展成这样一种方式,即他们报告暴力行为通常被认为是一种社会耻辱。当男性试图向他们报告家庭暴力时,大多数时候他们不被信任;相反,他们被嘲笑和嘲笑,因为他们认为自己被妻子打了
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信