Does Risk Diversification Always Work? The Answer Through Simple Modelling

Marc Busse, M. Dacorogna, M. Kratz
{"title":"Does Risk Diversification Always Work? The Answer Through Simple Modelling","authors":"Marc Busse, M. Dacorogna, M. Kratz","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2281823","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With a simple example of throwing a die, we show how to price an insurance policy. We further study how this price decreases when many similar policies are sold. The diversification benefits increase with the number of policies and similarly the risk loading of the premium required for the risk decreases tending to zero. This is true as long as the risks are completely independent. However, when introducing in addition a biased die played by a crooked croupier, a non-diversifiable risk does appear. Indeed, we can show analytically that, with the biased die, there exists an additional term in the variance, which does not decrease with the number of policies in the portfolio and leads to a limit to diversification. We propose and study analytically three cases of introducing the non-diversifiable risk. For each of them, the behavior of the risk loading based on the underlying risk process is examined and a numerical illustration is provided. Then the results are discussed in view of the risk loading. Such a modelling could be used to study particular investment choices under uncertainty.","PeriodicalId":129812,"journal":{"name":"Financial Engineering eJournal","volume":"99 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Financial Engineering eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2281823","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

With a simple example of throwing a die, we show how to price an insurance policy. We further study how this price decreases when many similar policies are sold. The diversification benefits increase with the number of policies and similarly the risk loading of the premium required for the risk decreases tending to zero. This is true as long as the risks are completely independent. However, when introducing in addition a biased die played by a crooked croupier, a non-diversifiable risk does appear. Indeed, we can show analytically that, with the biased die, there exists an additional term in the variance, which does not decrease with the number of policies in the portfolio and leads to a limit to diversification. We propose and study analytically three cases of introducing the non-diversifiable risk. For each of them, the behavior of the risk loading based on the underlying risk process is examined and a numerical illustration is provided. Then the results are discussed in view of the risk loading. Such a modelling could be used to study particular investment choices under uncertainty.
风险分散是否总是有效?通过简单的建模得到答案
通过一个掷骰子的简单例子,我们将展示如何为保险单定价。我们进一步研究了在销售许多类似保单时,价格是如何下降的。多样化收益随着保单数量的增加而增加,同样,风险所需保费的风险负荷也趋于零。只要风险是完全独立的,这是正确的。然而,当引入另外一个由不诚实的庄家掷出的有偏差的骰子时,一个不可分散的风险确实出现了。实际上,我们可以分析地表明,对于偏置骰子,方差中存在一个额外的项,该项不随投资组合中策略的数量而减少,并导致多样化的限制。本文提出并分析研究了三种引入不可分散风险的案例。对于其中的每一种,基于潜在风险过程的风险加载行为进行了检查,并提供了数值说明。然后从风险负荷的角度对结果进行了讨论。这种模型可用于研究不确定性下的特定投资选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信