Ptosis surgery in Bukavu, Democratic Republic of the Congo: comparative study of two surgical techniques

{"title":"Ptosis surgery in Bukavu, Democratic Republic of the Congo: comparative study of two surgical techniques","authors":"","doi":"10.15406/aovs.2023.13.00434","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: The objective of this study is to report the results of the management of ptosis in our practice by comparing two techniques, one consisting of the resection of the levator of the upper eyelid and the other of the suspension of the upper eyelid to the frontal muscle. Methodology: This is a prospective study of all consecutive ptosis patients in two ophthalmology departments in Bukavu (in Democratic Republic of the Congo) from 1 January 2018 to 31 December 2021. All patients were operated on by the same surgeon with a minimum of 6 months follow-up post-operatively. Results: A total of 55 patients were treated for ptosis during the study period, including 31 with upper eyelid levator resection and 24 with upper eyelid suspension to frontal muscle. We found that male sex, cosmetic gene, congenital ptosis, left location, moderate degree and isolated ptosis were predominant in both groups of patients, but statistical comparison between these two groups was not significant (p>0.05). For post-operative complications, there was a statistically significant difference between the two treatments (p=0.0002). After treatment, the statistical analysis shows that the median value of visual acuity in patients who underwent upper eyelid levator resection was significantly higher than that in patients who underwent upper eyelid suspension to frontal muscle (p=0.021). Conclusion: The results of this study show that resection of the upper eyelid levator seems to be the best surgical technique compared to the suspension to the frontal muscle in our context.","PeriodicalId":287670,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Ophthalmology & Visual System","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Ophthalmology & Visual System","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15406/aovs.2023.13.00434","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The objective of this study is to report the results of the management of ptosis in our practice by comparing two techniques, one consisting of the resection of the levator of the upper eyelid and the other of the suspension of the upper eyelid to the frontal muscle. Methodology: This is a prospective study of all consecutive ptosis patients in two ophthalmology departments in Bukavu (in Democratic Republic of the Congo) from 1 January 2018 to 31 December 2021. All patients were operated on by the same surgeon with a minimum of 6 months follow-up post-operatively. Results: A total of 55 patients were treated for ptosis during the study period, including 31 with upper eyelid levator resection and 24 with upper eyelid suspension to frontal muscle. We found that male sex, cosmetic gene, congenital ptosis, left location, moderate degree and isolated ptosis were predominant in both groups of patients, but statistical comparison between these two groups was not significant (p>0.05). For post-operative complications, there was a statistically significant difference between the two treatments (p=0.0002). After treatment, the statistical analysis shows that the median value of visual acuity in patients who underwent upper eyelid levator resection was significantly higher than that in patients who underwent upper eyelid suspension to frontal muscle (p=0.021). Conclusion: The results of this study show that resection of the upper eyelid levator seems to be the best surgical technique compared to the suspension to the frontal muscle in our context.
刚果民主共和国布卡武的上睑下垂手术:两种手术技术的比较研究
前言:本研究的目的是通过比较两种技术,一种是切除上睑提肌,另一种是将上睑悬吊到额肌,来报告我们治疗上睑下垂的结果。方法:这是一项前瞻性研究,研究对象是2018年1月1日至2021年12月31日在布卡武(刚果民主共和国)两个眼科部门连续就诊的所有上睑下垂患者。所有患者均由同一位外科医生进行手术,术后随访至少6个月。结果:研究期间共收治上睑下垂患者55例,其中上睑提肌切除术31例,额肌悬吊术24例。我们发现两组患者中以男性、美容基因、先天性上睑下垂、左侧位置、中度上睑下垂、孤立性上睑下垂为主,但两组间差异无统计学意义(p < 0.05)。术后并发症两组比较差异有统计学意义(p=0.0002)。治疗后,统计分析显示,上睑提肌切除术患者的视力中位数明显高于上睑额肌悬吊术患者(p=0.021)。结论:本研究结果表明,与额肌悬吊术相比,切除上睑提肌似乎是最好的手术方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信