Audience constructions of fake news in Australian media representations of asylum seekers

Ashleigh L. Haw
{"title":"Audience constructions of fake news in Australian media representations of asylum seekers","authors":"Ashleigh L. Haw","doi":"10.1075/JLP.21028.HAW","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n In recent years, the term ‘fake news’ has gained considerable traction in scholarly and public discourse. While fake news\n is increasingly attributed to declining audience trust, we know little about how publics are making sense of the concept. To address this, I\n discuss findings arising from interviews with 24 Western Australian media consumers who offered their perspectives on Australian news\n coverage of asylum seekers. Combining Critical Discourse methods with Rhetorical Analysis, findings highlight how participants evaluated\n misinformation and disinformation about asylum seekers and in particular, how some adopted a discourse of ‘fake news’ to delegitimise\n perspectives that oppose their own stance. Discussed alongside Egelhofer and Lecheler’s (2019)\n theoretical framework of the fake news ‘label’, I argue that by understanding how audiences discussed fake news before the concept rose to\n prominence in 2016, scholars can meaningfully examine discursive patterns within social constructions of fake news across numerous\n contemporary and historical contexts.","PeriodicalId":167182,"journal":{"name":"Discourses of Fake News","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Discourses of Fake News","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/JLP.21028.HAW","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

In recent years, the term ‘fake news’ has gained considerable traction in scholarly and public discourse. While fake news is increasingly attributed to declining audience trust, we know little about how publics are making sense of the concept. To address this, I discuss findings arising from interviews with 24 Western Australian media consumers who offered their perspectives on Australian news coverage of asylum seekers. Combining Critical Discourse methods with Rhetorical Analysis, findings highlight how participants evaluated misinformation and disinformation about asylum seekers and in particular, how some adopted a discourse of ‘fake news’ to delegitimise perspectives that oppose their own stance. Discussed alongside Egelhofer and Lecheler’s (2019) theoretical framework of the fake news ‘label’, I argue that by understanding how audiences discussed fake news before the concept rose to prominence in 2016, scholars can meaningfully examine discursive patterns within social constructions of fake news across numerous contemporary and historical contexts.
观众对澳大利亚媒体中关于寻求庇护者的假新闻的建构
近年来,“假新闻”一词在学术和公共话语中获得了相当大的关注。虽然假新闻越来越多地归因于受众信任度下降,但我们对公众如何理解这一概念知之甚少。为了解决这个问题,我讨论了对24位西澳大利亚媒体消费者的采访结果,他们提供了他们对澳大利亚寻求庇护者新闻报道的看法。将批判性话语方法与修辞分析相结合,研究结果突出了参与者如何评估关于寻求庇护者的错误信息和虚假信息,特别是一些人如何采用“假新闻”话语来使反对自己立场的观点合法化。与Egelhofer和Lecheler(2019)关于假新闻“标签”的理论框架一起讨论时,我认为,通过了解2016年假新闻概念兴起之前受众如何讨论假新闻,学者们可以在众多当代和历史背景下有意义地研究假新闻社会结构中的话语模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信