Diversity and Recruitment of Minorities in Clinical Trials: An Unmet Need

Nathalie Vives
{"title":"Diversity and Recruitment of Minorities in Clinical Trials: An Unmet Need","authors":"Nathalie Vives","doi":"10.17140/ctpoj-1-112","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Patient centricity has led to the idea that drugs should answer medical needs not only defined by the medical bodies but relevant for the patients themselves. This implies that the diversity of the patients should be represented in clinical trials. Disparities in representation of diverse populations in clinical trials have been well-documented for several pathologies like arterial hypertension, diabetes but also in oncology. Today, Caucasian patients included in clinical trials represent at least 75% of the clinical trials population even in pathologies where minorities are largely more affected than Caucasians. Filling the gap in diversity is an important matter to ensure ethics, good practices, regulatory compliance, patient safety and scientific validity. To achieve their recruitment goals and being patient centric, sponsors and investigational sites need to pay attention of this problem and put in place specific strategies. Mistrust of patients of minority groups toward clinical research is one of the main barriers along with lack of access to clinical trials (low awareness, communication barriers, distance to investigational sites). Adapted communication, community-based strategies are some of the useful strategies directed to the patients. Investigators may not encounter diverse populations in their area or may not be aware of unconscious bias when identifying patients suitable for a clinical trial. Looking for referrals and raising awareness of the risk of bias with training on culturally sounded approaches could help investigators to recruit more diverse populations. Lack of awareness and costs may prevent sponsors to focus on diversity but ethics, benefits of data acquisition and patient centricity should be enough motivators to modify this trend. Patients, investigators and sponsors have their own barriers to tackle the lack of diversity in clinical trials. The cultural background of all stakeholders is an important factor in those barriers. Only multidisciplinary approaches including human sciences would help to define patient recruitment strategies that would mitigate the current lack of diversity","PeriodicalId":259842,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Trials and Practice – Open Journal","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Trials and Practice – Open Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17140/ctpoj-1-112","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Patient centricity has led to the idea that drugs should answer medical needs not only defined by the medical bodies but relevant for the patients themselves. This implies that the diversity of the patients should be represented in clinical trials. Disparities in representation of diverse populations in clinical trials have been well-documented for several pathologies like arterial hypertension, diabetes but also in oncology. Today, Caucasian patients included in clinical trials represent at least 75% of the clinical trials population even in pathologies where minorities are largely more affected than Caucasians. Filling the gap in diversity is an important matter to ensure ethics, good practices, regulatory compliance, patient safety and scientific validity. To achieve their recruitment goals and being patient centric, sponsors and investigational sites need to pay attention of this problem and put in place specific strategies. Mistrust of patients of minority groups toward clinical research is one of the main barriers along with lack of access to clinical trials (low awareness, communication barriers, distance to investigational sites). Adapted communication, community-based strategies are some of the useful strategies directed to the patients. Investigators may not encounter diverse populations in their area or may not be aware of unconscious bias when identifying patients suitable for a clinical trial. Looking for referrals and raising awareness of the risk of bias with training on culturally sounded approaches could help investigators to recruit more diverse populations. Lack of awareness and costs may prevent sponsors to focus on diversity but ethics, benefits of data acquisition and patient centricity should be enough motivators to modify this trend. Patients, investigators and sponsors have their own barriers to tackle the lack of diversity in clinical trials. The cultural background of all stakeholders is an important factor in those barriers. Only multidisciplinary approaches including human sciences would help to define patient recruitment strategies that would mitigate the current lack of diversity
临床试验中少数群体的多样性和招募:一个未满足的需求
以患者为中心导致了这样一种观念,即药物不仅应该满足医疗机构的医疗需求,而且应该满足患者自身的医疗需求。这意味着患者的多样性应该在临床试验中得到体现。临床试验中不同人群的代表性差异在动脉高血压、糖尿病和肿瘤等几种疾病中都有充分的证据。今天,包括在临床试验中的白种人患者至少占临床试验人群的75%,即使在少数族裔比白种人更受影响的病理中也是如此。填补多样性的空白是确保道德、良好做法、法规遵从、患者安全和科学有效性的重要事项。为了实现他们的招募目标并以患者为中心,赞助商和研究地点需要关注这个问题并制定具体的策略。少数群体患者对临床研究的不信任与缺乏获得临床试验的机会(意识低、沟通障碍、与研究地点距离远)是主要障碍之一。适应沟通,以社区为基础的策略是针对患者的一些有用的策略。在确定适合临床试验的患者时,研究人员可能不会在他们的地区遇到不同的人群,或者可能没有意识到无意识的偏见。通过对符合文化的方法进行培训,寻找推荐人并提高对偏见风险的认识,可以帮助调查人员招募更多不同的人群。缺乏意识和成本可能会阻止赞助商关注多样性,但道德、数据获取的好处和以患者为中心应该足以改变这一趋势。在解决临床试验缺乏多样性的问题上,患者、研究者和赞助者都有自己的障碍。所有利益相关者的文化背景是造成这些障碍的一个重要因素。只有包括人文科学在内的多学科方法才能帮助确定患者招募策略,以缓解目前缺乏多样性的情况
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信