Bones and Sinews

Matthew Johnson
{"title":"Bones and Sinews","authors":"Matthew Johnson","doi":"10.7591/cornell/9781501748585.003.0002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter discusses how black student activists led a campus strike at the University of Michigan (UM) in 1970, challenging entrenched ideas and practices that seemed so natural and embedded in the institution that administrators had never questioned them. The institutional values and practices that justified an admissions system that created racial disparities began in the mid-nineteenth century. Two core values emerged at the first board of regents meetings in Ann Arbor. Campus leaders wanted to create a university on par with any in the United States, and they wanted the university to offer broad access to the people of Michigan. But over the course of the nineteenth and twentieth centuries, campus leaders chose to subordinate the ideal of access to the goal of attaining and sustaining UM's elite status. In the 1940s and 1950s, administrators slowly purged official practices that mandated or accommodated segregation in campus buildings and social clubs. They slowly incorporated the prevailing ideas of racial liberalism. However, administrators never anticipated how the implementation of racial liberalism would impact black students. The ways that UM leaders crafted the model multiracial community led to a toxic racial climate at UM.","PeriodicalId":220973,"journal":{"name":"Undermining Racial Justice","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Undermining Racial Justice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7591/cornell/9781501748585.003.0002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This chapter discusses how black student activists led a campus strike at the University of Michigan (UM) in 1970, challenging entrenched ideas and practices that seemed so natural and embedded in the institution that administrators had never questioned them. The institutional values and practices that justified an admissions system that created racial disparities began in the mid-nineteenth century. Two core values emerged at the first board of regents meetings in Ann Arbor. Campus leaders wanted to create a university on par with any in the United States, and they wanted the university to offer broad access to the people of Michigan. But over the course of the nineteenth and twentieth centuries, campus leaders chose to subordinate the ideal of access to the goal of attaining and sustaining UM's elite status. In the 1940s and 1950s, administrators slowly purged official practices that mandated or accommodated segregation in campus buildings and social clubs. They slowly incorporated the prevailing ideas of racial liberalism. However, administrators never anticipated how the implementation of racial liberalism would impact black students. The ways that UM leaders crafted the model multiracial community led to a toxic racial climate at UM.
骨骼和肌肉
本章讨论1970年,黑人学生积极分子如何在密歇根大学(UM)领导校园罢工,挑战根深蒂固的观念和做法,这些观念和做法似乎是如此自然和根深蒂固,以至于管理人员从未质疑过它们。为造成种族差异的招生制度辩护的制度价值和实践始于19世纪中期。在安娜堡举行的第一次董事会会议上,出现了两个核心价值观。校园领导希望创建一所与美国任何一所大学相媲美的大学,他们希望这所大学能为密歇根人民提供广泛的机会。但在19世纪和20世纪的过程中,校园领导者选择将进入大学的理想置于实现和维持澳大精英地位的目标之下。在20世纪40年代和50年代,管理人员慢慢清除了在校园建筑和社交俱乐部中强制或容纳种族隔离的官方做法。他们慢慢地吸收了流行的种族自由主义思想。然而,管理人员从来没有预料到种族自由主义的实施会对黑人学生产生怎样的影响。UM领导人精心打造模范多种族社区的方式导致了UM有毒的种族氛围。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信