{"title":"Exit Stimulus","authors":"Charlotte Rommerskirchen","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198829010.003.0008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter considers the determinants of fiscal policy outcomes during the Consolidation Years 2011–14. It disagrees with the claim that Europe is under the spell of an austerity illusion. Echoing Chapter 5, it finds that member states’ fiscal consolidation was by and large in line with domestic fiscal space. Proponents of fiscal rules would credit the strictures of the Stability and Growth Pact (SGP) or newly created debt brakes for bringing about consolidation. Yet there is no convincing evidence that these rules mattered for fiscal policy outcomes. Instead, financial market pressure mattered—this holds for the Stimulus Years and Consolidation Years alike. Market discipline is not felt equally across the EU. A prominent emerging fault line runs between program countries and those who fear the threat of market panic on the one hand, and credit countries who remain largely insulated from the vagaries of international capital markets on the other.","PeriodicalId":159711,"journal":{"name":"EU Fiscal Policy Coordination in Hard Times","volume":"38 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EU Fiscal Policy Coordination in Hard Times","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198829010.003.0008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This chapter considers the determinants of fiscal policy outcomes during the Consolidation Years 2011–14. It disagrees with the claim that Europe is under the spell of an austerity illusion. Echoing Chapter 5, it finds that member states’ fiscal consolidation was by and large in line with domestic fiscal space. Proponents of fiscal rules would credit the strictures of the Stability and Growth Pact (SGP) or newly created debt brakes for bringing about consolidation. Yet there is no convincing evidence that these rules mattered for fiscal policy outcomes. Instead, financial market pressure mattered—this holds for the Stimulus Years and Consolidation Years alike. Market discipline is not felt equally across the EU. A prominent emerging fault line runs between program countries and those who fear the threat of market panic on the one hand, and credit countries who remain largely insulated from the vagaries of international capital markets on the other.
本章考虑2011-14年财政整顿年度财政政策结果的决定因素。它不同意欧洲陷入紧缩幻觉的说法。与第5章相呼应,本研究发现成员国的财政整顿总体上符合国内财政空间。财政规则的支持者将把实现财政巩固归功于《稳定与增长公约》(Stability and Growth Pact, SGP)的严格规定或新创建的债务刹车。然而,没有令人信服的证据表明,这些规则对财政政策的结果有影响。相反,金融市场的压力起了作用——这对刺激年和整顿年都是一样的。欧盟各国对市场纪律的感受不尽相同。一方面,计划国和那些担心市场恐慌威胁的国家,另一方面,在很大程度上不受国际资本市场变幻莫测影响的信贷国家之间,出现了一条明显的断层线。