Extending a mobile prototyping tool to support user interface design patterns and reusability

J. Wesson, N. L. O. Cowley, C. Brooks
{"title":"Extending a mobile prototyping tool to support user interface design patterns and reusability","authors":"J. Wesson, N. L. O. Cowley, C. Brooks","doi":"10.1145/3129416.3129444","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A number of current mobile prototyping tools exist that support designing prototypes for mobile platforms. Most of these tools do not support the use of mobile user interface (UI) design pattern collections or languages, such as Google's Material Design Pattern Library. Support is only provided for low-level physical widgets, such as butons and lists, and their behaviours. These prototypes are designed to be code-free, throwaway prototypes, and functionality cannot be added to them. The only functionality supported is the ability to link screens for simulation purposes. An existing feature of the mobile prototyping tool, Proto.io, was extended to support the use of selected Material Design Pattern Library patterns to generate prototype templates. A parser was written to convert these prototype templates, exported from Proto.io in HTML format, into Android-compatible XML that could be imported into the Android Studio Integrated Development Environment (IDE), for further development. A user study was conducted to compare the two different approaches for creating a mobile application: creating the mobile application entirely in Android Studio, or using the extended version of Proto.io for designing the mobile UI, and importing the generated XML into Android Studio for further development. These two approaches were compared in terms of efficiency, effectiveness, and user satisfaction, as evaluated by several designers. The mobile UI patterns-based approach was found to be superior to the development-centred approach.","PeriodicalId":269578,"journal":{"name":"Research Conference of the South African Institute of Computer Scientists and Information Technologists","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research Conference of the South African Institute of Computer Scientists and Information Technologists","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3129416.3129444","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

A number of current mobile prototyping tools exist that support designing prototypes for mobile platforms. Most of these tools do not support the use of mobile user interface (UI) design pattern collections or languages, such as Google's Material Design Pattern Library. Support is only provided for low-level physical widgets, such as butons and lists, and their behaviours. These prototypes are designed to be code-free, throwaway prototypes, and functionality cannot be added to them. The only functionality supported is the ability to link screens for simulation purposes. An existing feature of the mobile prototyping tool, Proto.io, was extended to support the use of selected Material Design Pattern Library patterns to generate prototype templates. A parser was written to convert these prototype templates, exported from Proto.io in HTML format, into Android-compatible XML that could be imported into the Android Studio Integrated Development Environment (IDE), for further development. A user study was conducted to compare the two different approaches for creating a mobile application: creating the mobile application entirely in Android Studio, or using the extended version of Proto.io for designing the mobile UI, and importing the generated XML into Android Studio for further development. These two approaches were compared in terms of efficiency, effectiveness, and user satisfaction, as evaluated by several designers. The mobile UI patterns-based approach was found to be superior to the development-centred approach.
扩展移动原型工具以支持用户界面设计模式和可重用性
目前存在许多支持为移动平台设计原型的移动原型工具。这些工具中的大多数都不支持使用移动用户界面(UI)设计模式集合或语言,比如Google的Material design pattern Library。它只支持低级别的物理部件,比如按钮和列表,以及它们的行为。这些原型被设计成无代码的、一次性的原型,并且不能向其中添加功能。唯一支持的功能是为了模拟目的链接屏幕的能力。移动原型工具Proto的现有功能。扩展到支持使用选定的材料设计模式库模式来生成原型模板。编写了一个解析器来转换从Proto导出的这些原型模板。将HTML格式的io转换为与Android兼容的XML,该XML可以导入Android Studio集成开发环境(IDE),以便进一步开发。我们进行了一项用户研究,比较了两种不同的手机应用开发方法:完全在Android Studio中开发手机应用,或者使用扩展版的Proto。并将生成的XML导入Android Studio进行进一步开发。这两种方法在效率、有效性和用户满意度方面进行了比较,并由几位设计师进行了评估。基于移动UI模式的方法优于以开发为中心的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信