ESG Equity Index Investing: Don’t Forget about Factor Exposures

Jan-Carl Plagge, Marvin Ertl, Douglas M. Grim
{"title":"ESG Equity Index Investing: Don’t Forget about Factor Exposures","authors":"Jan-Carl Plagge, Marvin Ertl, Douglas M. Grim","doi":"10.3905/jbis.2022.13.4.163","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We explore the risk and return characteristics of an extensive set of investable index-linked environmental, social, and governance (ESG) equity strategies, including those with a US, European, Asia-Pacific ex. Japan, Japanese as well as global developed and emerging market investment focus from 2013–2021. A style factor–based return decomposition, as well as a Shapley–Owen risk decomposition with a focus on the factors size, value, profitability, investment, and momentum, reveal that the performance of many ESG investment strategies is largely driven by well-known traditional sources of risk. Once we control for these well-known traditional sources of risk, we find only limited evidence for the existence of an independent ESG-related factor in the form of a statistically significant alpha. However, we find variability in the exposure to, and influence of, the factors explored, within and across regions as well as over time. Among style factors, the negative exposure to size is the most common statistically significant fund-level tilt. As a result of our findings, investors should form an opinion not only as to whether they expect a specific ESG index strategy to have a (factor-adjusted) positive or negative alpha, but also whether they expect it to exhibit any persistent factor tilts and whether such tilts may help or hurt long-term absolute performance.","PeriodicalId":284314,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Beta Investment Strategies","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Beta Investment Strategies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3905/jbis.2022.13.4.163","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We explore the risk and return characteristics of an extensive set of investable index-linked environmental, social, and governance (ESG) equity strategies, including those with a US, European, Asia-Pacific ex. Japan, Japanese as well as global developed and emerging market investment focus from 2013–2021. A style factor–based return decomposition, as well as a Shapley–Owen risk decomposition with a focus on the factors size, value, profitability, investment, and momentum, reveal that the performance of many ESG investment strategies is largely driven by well-known traditional sources of risk. Once we control for these well-known traditional sources of risk, we find only limited evidence for the existence of an independent ESG-related factor in the form of a statistically significant alpha. However, we find variability in the exposure to, and influence of, the factors explored, within and across regions as well as over time. Among style factors, the negative exposure to size is the most common statistically significant fund-level tilt. As a result of our findings, investors should form an opinion not only as to whether they expect a specific ESG index strategy to have a (factor-adjusted) positive or negative alpha, but also whether they expect it to exhibit any persistent factor tilts and whether such tilts may help or hurt long-term absolute performance.
ESG股票指数投资:不要忘记因素暴露
我们探讨了一系列可投资的与指数挂钩的环境、社会和治理(ESG)股票策略的风险和回报特征,包括2013-2021年期间以美国、欧洲、亚太地区(不包括日本)、日本以及全球发达和新兴市场为投资重点的策略。基于风格因素的收益分解,以及关注因素规模、价值、盈利能力、投资和动量的Shapley-Owen风险分解,揭示了许多ESG投资策略的表现在很大程度上是由众所周知的传统风险来源驱动的。一旦我们控制了这些众所周知的传统风险来源,我们发现只有有限的证据表明存在一个独立的esg相关因素,其形式是统计上显著的alpha。然而,我们发现,在区域内和跨区域以及随着时间的推移,所探索的因素的暴露和影响存在差异。在风格因素中,负暴露于规模是最常见的统计显著的基金水平倾斜。根据我们的研究结果,投资者不仅应该判断他们是否期望特定的ESG指数策略具有(因素调整后的)正α还是负α,还应该判断他们是否期望它表现出任何持续的因素倾斜,以及这种倾斜是否有助于或损害长期绝对业绩。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信