Comparison of the effect of basic CPR training, in-person and e-learning, on self-efficacy of secondary school students

{"title":"Comparison of the effect of basic CPR training, in-person and e-learning, on self-efficacy of secondary school students","authors":"","doi":"10.32592/jorar.2021.13.2.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION: Today, cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) training is highly important to save the lives of people in need of CPR by those present at the scene, and it is useful to study new training tools in this field. This study aimed to determine and compare the effect of basic CPR face-to-face and electronic training on the self-efficacy of high school students.\nMETHODS: This randomized controlled field trial study was conducted on second-grade high school students in Tabas, Iran, referring to high schools by an announced call. The samples (n=62) were randomly selected and divided into two groups of e-learning and face-to-face training (n=31 each). Both groups completed the Basic Resuscitation Skills Self-Efficacy Scale at the baseline and 1 week and 2 months after the training intervention. The collected data were analyzed in SPSS software (version 20) using statistical measures of mean and standard deviation and statistical tests of t-test, Chi-square, and repeated measures analysis of variance.\nFINDINGS: The results showed that both e-learning and face-to-face training methods significantly increased the self-efficacy of high school students in CPR in 1 week and 2 months after training. In addition, a significant difference was observed between the two methods regarding the mean score of basic CPR self-efficacy 1 week after the intervention (P<0.001).\nCONCLUSION: Considering the benefits of e-learning on students' CPR learning, this method should be used seriously for basic CPR self-efficacy training.","PeriodicalId":132301,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rescue and Relief","volume":"91 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Rescue and Relief","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32592/jorar.2021.13.2.3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Today, cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) training is highly important to save the lives of people in need of CPR by those present at the scene, and it is useful to study new training tools in this field. This study aimed to determine and compare the effect of basic CPR face-to-face and electronic training on the self-efficacy of high school students. METHODS: This randomized controlled field trial study was conducted on second-grade high school students in Tabas, Iran, referring to high schools by an announced call. The samples (n=62) were randomly selected and divided into two groups of e-learning and face-to-face training (n=31 each). Both groups completed the Basic Resuscitation Skills Self-Efficacy Scale at the baseline and 1 week and 2 months after the training intervention. The collected data were analyzed in SPSS software (version 20) using statistical measures of mean and standard deviation and statistical tests of t-test, Chi-square, and repeated measures analysis of variance. FINDINGS: The results showed that both e-learning and face-to-face training methods significantly increased the self-efficacy of high school students in CPR in 1 week and 2 months after training. In addition, a significant difference was observed between the two methods regarding the mean score of basic CPR self-efficacy 1 week after the intervention (P<0.001). CONCLUSION: Considering the benefits of e-learning on students' CPR learning, this method should be used seriously for basic CPR self-efficacy training.
现场与网络心肺复苏术基础训练对中学生自我效能感的影响比较
导读:心肺复苏(CPR)培训对现场人员挽救需要心肺复苏的人的生命非常重要,研究这一领域的新培训工具是非常有用的。本研究旨在确定并比较基础CPR面对面与电子训练对高中生自我效能感的影响。方法:这项随机对照的现场试验研究是在伊朗Tabas的二年级高中学生中进行的,指的是一个宣布的高中。随机抽取样本(n=62),分为在线学习组和面对面培训组(n=31)。两组患者均在基线及训练干预后1周和2个月完成基本复苏技能自我效能量表。收集到的数据在SPSS软件(version 20)中进行分析,采用均数和标准差的统计计量,采用t检验、卡方检验和重复测量方差分析的统计检验。结果发现:在线学习和面对面培训方式均显著提高了高中生在培训后1周和2个月的心肺复苏自我效能感。干预后1周,两种方法的心肺复苏基本自我效能平均评分差异有统计学意义(P<0.001)。结论:考虑到电子学习对学生心肺复苏术学习的益处,应重视电子学习对学生心肺复苏术自我效能感的基础训练。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信