{"title":"Fostering Connection and Authenticity in Online Counselor Education through Relational Pedagogy","authors":"Laura Bruneau, Blaine Reilly","doi":"10.22371/tces/0007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"1 Adams State University, Alamosa, CO, USA 2 Adams State University, Alamosa, CO, USA What does it mean to connect with our students? How can we think about this sense of connection in a rapidly changing digital age? As posed by Harriet Schwartz (2019), these questions stress the notion of mattering in online and distance education. Given the influx of hybrid and online Counselor Education programs in recent years (Snow et al., 2018), it is paramount to reevaluate our pedagogical approaches to counselor education. One framework for training counselors is Relational Cultural Theory (RCT; Jordan, 2010; 2017). Within the counselor education literature, RCT has been applied to experiential coursework (Lertora et al., 2020), supervision (Lenz, 2014), and doctorallevel advising (Purgason et al., 2016). A relational approach posits learning as a byproduct of the interaction between people through mutual empathy, empowerment, and authenticity (Lertora et al., 2020). In nurturing these connections, students are empowered and develop a sense of self-worth. Educators, in turn, flourish professionally and personally, potentially reducing attrition and burnout. Moreover, the teacher-student relationship demands an exploration of inherent power dynamics (Schwartz, 2019). Education requires educators to actively address the issues of race, gender, and class. Instructors must not replicate the power structures; when doing so, systems of privilege are further rooted (hooks, 1994). However, “we are far less aware of our identities that grant us privilege than those that bring marginalization, discrimination, hate, and violence” (Schwartz, 2019, p. 7). Instructors also need to name the power difference in the professor-student relationship as full transparency is critical. As hooks (1994) described, “professors who expect students to share confessional narratives but who are themselves unwilling to share are exercising power in a manner that could be coercive” (p. 21). Indeed, having a sense of vulnerability is necessary for the relational space to grow and flourish.","PeriodicalId":188478,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Technology in Counselor Education and Supervision","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Technology in Counselor Education and Supervision","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22371/tces/0007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
1 Adams State University, Alamosa, CO, USA 2 Adams State University, Alamosa, CO, USA What does it mean to connect with our students? How can we think about this sense of connection in a rapidly changing digital age? As posed by Harriet Schwartz (2019), these questions stress the notion of mattering in online and distance education. Given the influx of hybrid and online Counselor Education programs in recent years (Snow et al., 2018), it is paramount to reevaluate our pedagogical approaches to counselor education. One framework for training counselors is Relational Cultural Theory (RCT; Jordan, 2010; 2017). Within the counselor education literature, RCT has been applied to experiential coursework (Lertora et al., 2020), supervision (Lenz, 2014), and doctorallevel advising (Purgason et al., 2016). A relational approach posits learning as a byproduct of the interaction between people through mutual empathy, empowerment, and authenticity (Lertora et al., 2020). In nurturing these connections, students are empowered and develop a sense of self-worth. Educators, in turn, flourish professionally and personally, potentially reducing attrition and burnout. Moreover, the teacher-student relationship demands an exploration of inherent power dynamics (Schwartz, 2019). Education requires educators to actively address the issues of race, gender, and class. Instructors must not replicate the power structures; when doing so, systems of privilege are further rooted (hooks, 1994). However, “we are far less aware of our identities that grant us privilege than those that bring marginalization, discrimination, hate, and violence” (Schwartz, 2019, p. 7). Instructors also need to name the power difference in the professor-student relationship as full transparency is critical. As hooks (1994) described, “professors who expect students to share confessional narratives but who are themselves unwilling to share are exercising power in a manner that could be coercive” (p. 21). Indeed, having a sense of vulnerability is necessary for the relational space to grow and flourish.
2 Adams State University, Alamosa, CO, USA与我们的学生建立联系意味着什么?在瞬息万变的数字时代,我们该如何看待这种联系感?正如哈里特·施瓦茨(2019)所提出的,这些问题强调了在线和远程教育的重要性。鉴于近年来混合和在线咨询教育项目的涌入(Snow等人,2018),重新评估我们的咨询教育教学方法至关重要。一个培训咨询师的框架是关系文化理论(RCT);乔丹,2010;2017)。在咨询师教育文献中,RCT已被应用于体验式课程(Lertora et al., 2020)、监督(Lenz, 2014)和博士级咨询(Purgason et al., 2016)。关系方法将学习视为人与人之间通过相互同情、授权和真实性互动的副产品(Lertora et al., 2020)。在培养这些联系的过程中,学生们得到了授权,并培养了自我价值感。反过来,教育工作者在专业和个人方面都能蓬勃发展,从而潜在地减少人员流失和倦怠。此外,师生关系需要探索内在的权力动力学(Schwartz, 2019)。教育要求教育者积极解决种族、性别和阶级问题。教员不得复制权力结构;当这样做的时候,特权制度进一步根深蒂固(hooks, 1994)。然而,“我们对赋予我们特权的身份的认识远远不如那些带来边缘化、歧视、仇恨和暴力的身份”(Schwartz, 2019,第7页)。教师还需要指出教授与学生关系中的权力差异,因为完全透明是至关重要的。正如hooks(1994)所描述的那样,“那些期望学生分享自白叙述但自己不愿意分享的教授正在以一种可能是强制性的方式行使权力”(第21页)。事实上,有一种脆弱感是关系空间成长和繁荣的必要条件。