The Absence of Justice in Nabokov's Pale Fire

S. Sweeney
{"title":"The Absence of Justice in Nabokov's Pale Fire","authors":"S. Sweeney","doi":"10.1353/nab.2019.0003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:Previous readings of Pale Fire overlook a crucial fact: its plot, structure, and narration depend upon the removal of a single character from the action. Judge Goldsworth's absence implies that justice cannot be attained within a text that, like other Nabokov novels, emphasizes the law. Kinbote's assertion of control over Shade's poem establishes estate law, contract law, and copyright law as interpretive contexts for Pale Fire, while questions about intellectual property lead to analogies with property law. Allusions to rules regulating neighbors' or tenants' liability—including stillicide and damnum infectum—point, in turn, to Goldsworth, Shade's neighbor and Kinbote's landlord. Nabokov's depiction of this missing character reflects his knowledge of the law school at Cornell; Hugh Warren Goldsworth's first and middle names suggest Charles Evans Hughes, a former Cornell law professor who was Chief Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court when Nabokov arrived in America, and Earl Warren, Chief Justice when he left. Nabokov draws on the legal concept of in camera—in the judge's chambers—to convey not only Goldsworth's physical withdrawal but also the location of his home, the arrangement of his possessions, and his household's organization. Thanks to Goldsworth's sabbatical, Kinbote gains access to Shade and the poem. Indeed, because Goldsworth resembles Shade and their properties are adjacent, the judge's absence leads to Shade's death at the hands of Jack Grey. This tragedy, glimpsed through Kinbote's distorted account, connects themes of property law, injury, displacement, and mistaken identity associated with Goldsworth throughout Pale Fire. Shade's murder demands justice—yet judicial proceedings are forestalled by Grey's suicide and Goldsworth, the novel's only judge, is not only absent but involved in the circumstances precipitating the crime. Despite Kinbote's belief in a divine Judge meting out appropriate rewards and punishments, Pale Fire hints that justice must be determined by Nabokov's readers.","PeriodicalId":110136,"journal":{"name":"Nabokov Studies","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nabokov Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/nab.2019.0003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract:Previous readings of Pale Fire overlook a crucial fact: its plot, structure, and narration depend upon the removal of a single character from the action. Judge Goldsworth's absence implies that justice cannot be attained within a text that, like other Nabokov novels, emphasizes the law. Kinbote's assertion of control over Shade's poem establishes estate law, contract law, and copyright law as interpretive contexts for Pale Fire, while questions about intellectual property lead to analogies with property law. Allusions to rules regulating neighbors' or tenants' liability—including stillicide and damnum infectum—point, in turn, to Goldsworth, Shade's neighbor and Kinbote's landlord. Nabokov's depiction of this missing character reflects his knowledge of the law school at Cornell; Hugh Warren Goldsworth's first and middle names suggest Charles Evans Hughes, a former Cornell law professor who was Chief Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court when Nabokov arrived in America, and Earl Warren, Chief Justice when he left. Nabokov draws on the legal concept of in camera—in the judge's chambers—to convey not only Goldsworth's physical withdrawal but also the location of his home, the arrangement of his possessions, and his household's organization. Thanks to Goldsworth's sabbatical, Kinbote gains access to Shade and the poem. Indeed, because Goldsworth resembles Shade and their properties are adjacent, the judge's absence leads to Shade's death at the hands of Jack Grey. This tragedy, glimpsed through Kinbote's distorted account, connects themes of property law, injury, displacement, and mistaken identity associated with Goldsworth throughout Pale Fire. Shade's murder demands justice—yet judicial proceedings are forestalled by Grey's suicide and Goldsworth, the novel's only judge, is not only absent but involved in the circumstances precipitating the crime. Despite Kinbote's belief in a divine Judge meting out appropriate rewards and punishments, Pale Fire hints that justice must be determined by Nabokov's readers.
纳博科夫《苍白的火焰》中正义的缺失
摘要:以往阅读《苍白的火焰》时忽略了一个至关重要的事实:它的情节、结构和叙述都依赖于一个人物从行动中消失。戈德沃斯法官的缺席意味着,在一部像纳博科夫其他小说一样强调法律的作品中,正义是无法实现的。金伯特对谢德诗歌的控制主张确立了不动产法、合同法和版权法作为《苍白之火》的解释语境,而关于知识产权的问题则导致了与物权法的类比。对规范邻居或房客责任的规则的影射——包括自杀和死亡感染——反过来指向了戈德沃斯,谢德的邻居和金波特的房东。纳博科夫对这个缺失人物的描述反映了他对康奈尔法学院的了解;休·沃伦·戈尔兹沃斯的名和中间名让人联想到查尔斯·埃文斯·休斯(Charles Evans Hughes)和厄尔·沃伦(Earl Warren),前者是康奈尔大学前法学教授,纳博科夫抵达美国时担任美国最高法院首席大法官。纳博科夫利用了“在镜头中”的法律概念——在法官的房间里——不仅传达了戈尔兹沃斯的实际撤退,还传达了他的家的位置,他的财产的安排,以及他的家庭组织。由于戈尔兹沃斯的休假,金波特得以接触到谢德和这首诗。的确,因为戈德沃斯长得像谢德,而且他们的财产相邻,法官的缺席导致谢德死于杰克·格雷之手。这个悲剧,通过金波特扭曲的叙述,将物权法、伤害、流离失所和与戈尔兹沃斯有关的错误身份的主题贯穿在《苍白的火》中。谢德的谋杀需要正义——然而司法程序因格雷的自杀而中断,小说中唯一的法官戈德沃斯不仅缺席,而且参与了促成犯罪的环境。尽管金波特相信有一位神圣的法官会给予适当的奖励和惩罚,但《苍白的火》暗示,正义必须由纳博科夫的读者来决定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书