Market Connectedness and Volatility Spillovers: A Meta-Literature Review

Kamesh Anand K, A. Mishra
{"title":"Market Connectedness and Volatility Spillovers: A Meta-Literature Review","authors":"Kamesh Anand K, A. Mishra","doi":"10.3390/commodities2030013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Evaluation of market connectedness and asymmetric volatility spillover has recently seen a surge in financial risk analytics and portfolio diversification. We carried out a meta-literature review on connectedness and spillovers, providing solid insight into the research field and robust guidelines for future investigation. The review consists of a quantitative bibliometric analysis of 594 papers and a qualitative content analysis of 77 papers covering 1991 to 2021. The results of the meta-citation analysis show that Diebold’s Spillover index (2007) is the predominant method in most works as far as market connectedness and spillover are concerned. With an extensive review, we achieved the following objectives: (1) Analyze the most influential authors, journals, and publications. (2) Understand the research streams and most studied streams. (3) Understand the theme’s structure, thematic evolution, and keyword trends. (4) Examine the pattern of collaboration and most productive affiliations. (5) Explore future research directions and untapped areas. The content analysis revealed the following important research streams in the current literature: (1) Asymmetries in market connectedness. (2) Influence of macro factors in market connectedness and spillover. (3) The role of oil in market spillovers and hedging portfolios. (4) Dynamic cross-market connectedness and spillovers. Our study is the first to employ a meta-review to assess the domain of market connectedness; thus, our work will significantly contribute to macroeconomic policymakers, researchers and hedging investors.","PeriodicalId":377639,"journal":{"name":"Commodities","volume":"126 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Commodities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/commodities2030013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Evaluation of market connectedness and asymmetric volatility spillover has recently seen a surge in financial risk analytics and portfolio diversification. We carried out a meta-literature review on connectedness and spillovers, providing solid insight into the research field and robust guidelines for future investigation. The review consists of a quantitative bibliometric analysis of 594 papers and a qualitative content analysis of 77 papers covering 1991 to 2021. The results of the meta-citation analysis show that Diebold’s Spillover index (2007) is the predominant method in most works as far as market connectedness and spillover are concerned. With an extensive review, we achieved the following objectives: (1) Analyze the most influential authors, journals, and publications. (2) Understand the research streams and most studied streams. (3) Understand the theme’s structure, thematic evolution, and keyword trends. (4) Examine the pattern of collaboration and most productive affiliations. (5) Explore future research directions and untapped areas. The content analysis revealed the following important research streams in the current literature: (1) Asymmetries in market connectedness. (2) Influence of macro factors in market connectedness and spillover. (3) The role of oil in market spillovers and hedging portfolios. (4) Dynamic cross-market connectedness and spillovers. Our study is the first to employ a meta-review to assess the domain of market connectedness; thus, our work will significantly contribute to macroeconomic policymakers, researchers and hedging investors.
市场连通性与波动溢出:元文献回顾
对市场连通性和不对称波动溢出的评估,最近在金融风险分析和投资组合多样化方面出现了激增。我们对连通性和溢出进行了元文献综述,为研究领域提供了坚实的见解,并为未来的研究提供了有力的指导。该综述包括对594篇论文的定量文献计量分析和对1991年至2021年期间77篇论文的定性内容分析。元引文分析结果表明,就市场连通性和溢出性而言,大多数研究都采用了dierebold的溢出指数(2007)方法。通过广泛的回顾,我们实现了以下目标:(1)分析最具影响力的作者、期刊和出版物。(2)了解研究方向和研究最多的方向。(3)了解主题结构、主题演变和关键词趋势。(4)检查合作模式和最有成效的从属关系。(5)探索未来的研究方向和尚未开发的领域。内容分析揭示了当前文献中以下几个重要的研究方向:(1)市场连通性的不对称性。(2)宏观因素对市场连通性和溢出的影响。(3)石油在市场溢出效应和对冲投资组合中的作用。(4)动态跨市场连通性和溢出效应。我们的研究首次采用元综述来评估市场连通性领域;因此,我们的工作将为宏观经济政策制定者、研究人员和对冲投资者做出重大贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信