How to Assess and Rank User-Generated Content on Web

Elaheh Momeni, Claire Cardie, N. Diakopoulos
{"title":"How to Assess and Rank User-Generated Content on Web","authors":"Elaheh Momeni, Claire Cardie, N. Diakopoulos","doi":"10.1145/3184558.3186239","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"User-generated content (UGC) on the Web, especially on social media platforms, facilitates the association of additional information with digital resources and online social topics and it can provide valuable supplementary content. However, UGC varies in quality and, consequently, raises the challenge of how to maximize its utility for a variety of end-users, in particular in the age of misinformation. This study aims to provide researchers and Web data curators with answers to the following questions: (1) What are the existing approaches and methods for assessing and ranking UGC (2) What features and metrics have been used successfully to assess and predict UGC value across a range of application domains This survey is composed of a systematic review of approaches for assessing and ranking UGC: results obtained by identifying and comparing methodologies within the context of short text-based UGC on the Web. This survey categorizes existing assessment and ranking approaches into four framework types and discusses the main contributions and considerations of each type. Furthermore, it suggests a need for further experimentation and encourages the development of new approaches for the assessment and ranking.","PeriodicalId":235572,"journal":{"name":"Companion Proceedings of the The Web Conference 2018","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Companion Proceedings of the The Web Conference 2018","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3184558.3186239","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

User-generated content (UGC) on the Web, especially on social media platforms, facilitates the association of additional information with digital resources and online social topics and it can provide valuable supplementary content. However, UGC varies in quality and, consequently, raises the challenge of how to maximize its utility for a variety of end-users, in particular in the age of misinformation. This study aims to provide researchers and Web data curators with answers to the following questions: (1) What are the existing approaches and methods for assessing and ranking UGC (2) What features and metrics have been used successfully to assess and predict UGC value across a range of application domains This survey is composed of a systematic review of approaches for assessing and ranking UGC: results obtained by identifying and comparing methodologies within the context of short text-based UGC on the Web. This survey categorizes existing assessment and ranking approaches into four framework types and discusses the main contributions and considerations of each type. Furthermore, it suggests a need for further experimentation and encourages the development of new approaches for the assessment and ranking.
如何对网络上用户生成的内容进行评估和排名
在网络上,特别是在社交媒体平台上,用户生成内容(UGC)有助于将附加信息与数字资源和在线社会话题联系起来,并可以提供有价值的补充内容。然而,UGC的质量参差不齐,因此提出了如何最大化其对各种终端用户的效用的挑战,特别是在错误信息的时代。本研究旨在为研究人员和网络数据管理员提供以下问题的答案:(1)评估和排名UGC的现有方法和方法是什么?(2)在一系列应用领域中,哪些特征和指标被成功地用于评估和预测UGC的价值?通过识别和比较Web上基于短文本的UGC背景下的方法获得的结果。本调查将现有的评估和排名方法分为四种框架类型,并讨论了每种类型的主要贡献和考虑因素。此外,报告建议有必要进行进一步的试验,并鼓励发展新的评价和排名办法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信