Heuristic algorithms for the Maximum Colorful Subtree problem

Kai Dührkop, Marie Lataretu, W. White, Sebastian Böcker
{"title":"Heuristic algorithms for the Maximum Colorful Subtree problem","authors":"Kai Dührkop, Marie Lataretu, W. White, Sebastian Böcker","doi":"10.4230/LIPIcs.WABI.2018.23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In metabolomics, small molecules are structurally elucidated using tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS); this resulted in the computational Maximum Colorful Subtree problem, which is NP-hard. Unfortunately, data from a single metabolite requires us to solve hundreds or thousands of instances of this problem; and in a single Liquid Chromatography MS/MS run, hundreds or thousands of metabolites are measured. \nHere, we comprehensively evaluate the performance of several heuristic algorithms for the problem against an exact algorithm. We put particular emphasis on whether a heuristic is able to rank candidates such that the correct solution is ranked highly. We propose this \"intermediate\" evaluation because evaluating the approximating quality of heuristics is misleading: Even a slightly suboptimal solution can be structurally very different from the true solution. On the other hand, we cannot structurally evaluate against the ground truth, as this is unknown. We find that particularly one of the heuristics consistently ranks the correct solution in a favorable position. Integrating the heuristic into the analysis pipeline results in a speedup of 10-fold or more, without sacrificing accuracy.","PeriodicalId":329847,"journal":{"name":"Workshop on Algorithms in Bioinformatics","volume":"65 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Workshop on Algorithms in Bioinformatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4230/LIPIcs.WABI.2018.23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

In metabolomics, small molecules are structurally elucidated using tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS); this resulted in the computational Maximum Colorful Subtree problem, which is NP-hard. Unfortunately, data from a single metabolite requires us to solve hundreds or thousands of instances of this problem; and in a single Liquid Chromatography MS/MS run, hundreds or thousands of metabolites are measured. Here, we comprehensively evaluate the performance of several heuristic algorithms for the problem against an exact algorithm. We put particular emphasis on whether a heuristic is able to rank candidates such that the correct solution is ranked highly. We propose this "intermediate" evaluation because evaluating the approximating quality of heuristics is misleading: Even a slightly suboptimal solution can be structurally very different from the true solution. On the other hand, we cannot structurally evaluate against the ground truth, as this is unknown. We find that particularly one of the heuristics consistently ranks the correct solution in a favorable position. Integrating the heuristic into the analysis pipeline results in a speedup of 10-fold or more, without sacrificing accuracy.
最大彩色子树问题的启发式算法
在代谢组学中,使用串联质谱(MS/MS)对小分子进行结构分析;这导致了计算最大彩色子树问题,这是np困难的。不幸的是,来自单一代谢物的数据需要我们解决数百或数千个这样的问题;在单次液相色谱MS/MS运行中,可以测量数百或数千种代谢物。在这里,我们针对一个精确的算法综合评估了几种启发式算法的性能。我们特别强调启发式是否能够对候选进行排名,从而使正确的解决方案排名靠前。我们提出这种“中间”评估,因为评估启发式的近似质量会产生误导:即使是稍微次优的解决方案,在结构上也可能与真正的解决方案非常不同。另一方面,我们不能在结构上对基础真理进行评估,因为这是未知的。我们发现其中一个启发式总是把正确的解排在有利的位置。将启发式方法集成到分析管道中可以在不牺牲准确性的情况下将速度提高10倍或更多。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信