The Most Suitable Test Method for Postural Control Evaluation: Correlation of Functional Reach Test and Modifications with Limits of Stability

M. Karabulut, Emre Gürses, S. Aksoy
{"title":"The Most Suitable Test Method for Postural Control Evaluation: Correlation of Functional Reach Test and Modifications with Limits of Stability","authors":"M. Karabulut, Emre Gürses, S. Aksoy","doi":"10.15437/jetr.992084","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: To evaluate the correlation of Functional Reach Test (FRT) and its modified versions (mFRTs) with the outcomes of Limits of Stability (LOS), and to identify the most appropriate test method to use in postural control assessment. \nMethods: 30 participants were included in the study. The participants performed FRT and mFRTs: firm ground dominant arm (FRT), firm ground both arms (FRTFB), soft ground dominant arm (FRTSD), soft ground both arms (FRTSB) and firm ground lateral FRTs. LOS was carried out with static posturography. The correlation of FRT and mFRTs with LOS parameters was evaluated as reaching distance and movement time. \nResults: A strong positive correlation was found between FRTFB and LOS-I endpoint excursion and maximum excursion (p","PeriodicalId":364922,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Exercise Therapy and Rehabilitation","volume":"4 5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Exercise Therapy and Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15437/jetr.992084","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the correlation of Functional Reach Test (FRT) and its modified versions (mFRTs) with the outcomes of Limits of Stability (LOS), and to identify the most appropriate test method to use in postural control assessment. Methods: 30 participants were included in the study. The participants performed FRT and mFRTs: firm ground dominant arm (FRT), firm ground both arms (FRTFB), soft ground dominant arm (FRTSD), soft ground both arms (FRTSB) and firm ground lateral FRTs. LOS was carried out with static posturography. The correlation of FRT and mFRTs with LOS parameters was evaluated as reaching distance and movement time. Results: A strong positive correlation was found between FRTFB and LOS-I endpoint excursion and maximum excursion (p
最适合姿势控制评价的测试方法:功能到达测试和修改与稳定性极限的相关性
目的:评价功能伸展测试(FRT)及其改良版本(mFRTs)与稳定性极限(LOS)结果的相关性,并确定最适合用于姿势控制评估的测试方法。方法:共30例受试者。参与者进行了快速反应和快速反应:坚实的地面优势臂(FRT),坚实的地面双臂(FRTFB),柔软的地面优势臂(FRTSD),柔软的地面双臂(FRTSB)和坚实的地面侧向快速反应。LOS是用静态姿势术进行的。以到达距离和运动时间为参数,评价了FRT和mfrt与LOS参数的相关性。结果:FRTFB与LOS-I终点偏移和最大偏移呈正相关(p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信