M. Cutajar, E. Gatt, I. Grech, O. Casha, J. Micallef
{"title":"Support Vector Machines with the priorities method for speaker independent phoneme recognition","authors":"M. Cutajar, E. Gatt, I. Grech, O. Casha, J. Micallef","doi":"10.1109/ISSPIT.2011.6151597","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A speaker independent phoneme recognition system, based on Support Vector Machines (SVMs) method was improved by adding a priority scheme to forecast the three most likely phonemes. The system helps improve the obtained recognitions rate. For the phoneme recognition system, four multiclass SVMs methods, the All-at-once, One-against-all, One-against-one, and the Directed Acyclic Graph SVM (DAGSVM), were designed. The One-against-one method performed best, achieving an accuracy of 53.70%. This accuracy was further increased to 75.41%, when the second and third priorities were considered in the priorities method. All tests were carried out on the TIMIT database.","PeriodicalId":288042,"journal":{"name":"2011 IEEE International Symposium on Signal Processing and Information Technology (ISSPIT)","volume":"80 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2011 IEEE International Symposium on Signal Processing and Information Technology (ISSPIT)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISSPIT.2011.6151597","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6
Abstract
A speaker independent phoneme recognition system, based on Support Vector Machines (SVMs) method was improved by adding a priority scheme to forecast the three most likely phonemes. The system helps improve the obtained recognitions rate. For the phoneme recognition system, four multiclass SVMs methods, the All-at-once, One-against-all, One-against-one, and the Directed Acyclic Graph SVM (DAGSVM), were designed. The One-against-one method performed best, achieving an accuracy of 53.70%. This accuracy was further increased to 75.41%, when the second and third priorities were considered in the priorities method. All tests were carried out on the TIMIT database.