Gender and psychological safety in virtual teams: the role of awareness types enabled by information technologies

JoAnne Yong-Kwan Lim
{"title":"Gender and psychological safety in virtual teams: the role of awareness types enabled by information technologies","authors":"JoAnne Yong-Kwan Lim","doi":"10.1108/tpm-01-2022-0006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nOrganizations worldwide use virtual teams to cope with the COVID-19 pandemic and capitalize on distributed members' unique expertise to accomplish essential tasks. A critical reason that inhibits virtual team members from leveraging each other’s knowledge is a lack of psychological safety. Specifically, individuals are unwilling to speak out for fear of negative repercussions, such as embarrassment to one’s image and rejection from others in their teams. The purpose of this study is to advance the importance of distinct awareness (task knowledge and presence) enabled by information technologies in developing the psychological safety of men and women in virtual teams.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThis study tested the hypotheses using a survey study of 94 participants from 19 graduate student virtual teams.\n\n\nFindings\nThis study found that task knowledge awareness predicted psychological safety for men, whereas it was presence awareness for women. By demonstrating the role of awareness in promoting psychological safety for men and women in virtual teams, this study also sheds light on reducing online gender inequitable issues.\n\n\nPractical implications\nFirst, organizational managers need to incorporate gender when deciding the awareness type to promote psychological safety in virtual teams. For men, it is task knowledge awareness, whereas for women, it is presence awareness. Second, as there is a wide range of information technologies (ITs) available, managers need to identify if the provided ITs enable virtual team members to develop the specific type of knowledge awareness critical for psychological safety development. Third, managers can incorporate rewards and apply interventions at regular temporal periods to encourage team members to increase their online presence as well as question and share task-related content.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nIt is imperative to identify ways to encourage men and women working in virtual teams to speak up so that the expertise held by the members can be better leveraged. This study represents an important step in this direction.\n","PeriodicalId":150524,"journal":{"name":"Team Performance Management: An International Journal","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Team Performance Management: An International Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/tpm-01-2022-0006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Purpose Organizations worldwide use virtual teams to cope with the COVID-19 pandemic and capitalize on distributed members' unique expertise to accomplish essential tasks. A critical reason that inhibits virtual team members from leveraging each other’s knowledge is a lack of psychological safety. Specifically, individuals are unwilling to speak out for fear of negative repercussions, such as embarrassment to one’s image and rejection from others in their teams. The purpose of this study is to advance the importance of distinct awareness (task knowledge and presence) enabled by information technologies in developing the psychological safety of men and women in virtual teams. Design/methodology/approach This study tested the hypotheses using a survey study of 94 participants from 19 graduate student virtual teams. Findings This study found that task knowledge awareness predicted psychological safety for men, whereas it was presence awareness for women. By demonstrating the role of awareness in promoting psychological safety for men and women in virtual teams, this study also sheds light on reducing online gender inequitable issues. Practical implications First, organizational managers need to incorporate gender when deciding the awareness type to promote psychological safety in virtual teams. For men, it is task knowledge awareness, whereas for women, it is presence awareness. Second, as there is a wide range of information technologies (ITs) available, managers need to identify if the provided ITs enable virtual team members to develop the specific type of knowledge awareness critical for psychological safety development. Third, managers can incorporate rewards and apply interventions at regular temporal periods to encourage team members to increase their online presence as well as question and share task-related content. Originality/value It is imperative to identify ways to encourage men and women working in virtual teams to speak up so that the expertise held by the members can be better leveraged. This study represents an important step in this direction.
虚拟团队中的性别和心理安全:信息技术带来的意识类型的作用
目的世界各地的组织使用虚拟团队来应对COVID-19大流行,并利用分布式成员的独特专业知识来完成基本任务。阻碍虚拟团队成员利用彼此知识的一个关键原因是缺乏心理安全感。具体来说,个人不愿意说出来是因为害怕负面影响,比如个人形象的尴尬和团队中其他人的拒绝。本研究旨在探讨资讯科技所带来的不同意识(任务知识与在场感)在虚拟团队中发展男女心理安全的重要性。设计/方法/方法本研究通过对来自19个研究生虚拟团队的94名参与者的调查研究来检验假设。研究发现:任务知识意识预测男性的心理安全,而任务知识意识预测女性的心理安全。通过展示意识在促进虚拟团队中男女心理安全方面的作用,本研究还揭示了减少网络性别不平等问题。首先,组织管理者在决定意识类型时需要考虑性别因素,以促进虚拟团队的心理安全。对于男性来说,这是任务知识意识,而对于女性来说,这是存在意识。其次,由于有广泛的信息技术(it)可用,管理者需要确定所提供的it是否使虚拟团队成员能够发展对心理安全发展至关重要的特定类型的知识意识。第三,管理者可以在定期的时间段里加入奖励和应用干预,以鼓励团队成员增加他们的在线存在,以及提问和分享与任务相关的内容。创意/价值必须找到鼓励在虚拟团队中工作的男性和女性畅所欲言的方法,以便更好地利用成员所拥有的专业知识。这项研究是朝着这个方向迈出的重要一步。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信