Bei welchen psychosomatischen Patienten sind berufsbezogene Therapiebausteine indiziert? Therapeutenentscheidung und operationalisierte Zuweisungskriterien im Vergleich

A. Hillert, D. Staedtke, U. Cuntz, K. Hafen1 Jastrebow2 Nübling2 Bengel1
{"title":"Bei welchen psychosomatischen Patienten sind berufsbezogene Therapiebausteine indiziert? Therapeutenentscheidung und operationalisierte Zuweisungskriterien im Vergleich","authors":"A. Hillert, D. Staedtke, U. Cuntz, K. Hafen1 Jastrebow2 Nübling2 Bengel1","doi":"10.1055/s-2001-15986","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": The necessity to offer special therapeutic programmes focusing on job related problems in psychosomatic rehabilitation has become increasingly evident. Which patients should participate in such programmes? This question has not yet been discussed with regard to its theoretical and methodological implications. In clinical practice the decision has been based on the therapists evaluation. 105 patients, consecutively admitted in a psychosomatic hospital were interviewed with a screening questionnaire about their job related strains and the perceived interaction between symptomatology and job. According to the literature guidelines for inclusion of psychosomatic patients to a special work hardening programme were used. Therapists were asked to independently assign their patients to the programme. The overlap between the two procedures was small. While the guidelines focussed on a high level of job strain and the patient's motivation for a job-related therapeutic approach, the therapists' decision was based on duration of inability to work, impairments at work due to the symptoms, conflicts with colleagues at work and the patient's ability to perceive problems in a differentiated manner. Considering the problem of inclusion-criteria for a work hardening programme, the highly complex constellations behind routine therapeutic decisions in psychosomatic rehabilitation became evident. To integrate medical diagnosis, symptomatology, psychological models, job strain, the patient's social situation and values, is a neglected but important goal of rehabilitation sciences and should be a base for a concept guiding the development, evaluation and establishment of work related therapeutic programmes.","PeriodicalId":423642,"journal":{"name":"Rehabilitation Die","volume":"40 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rehabilitation Die","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2001-15986","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

: The necessity to offer special therapeutic programmes focusing on job related problems in psychosomatic rehabilitation has become increasingly evident. Which patients should participate in such programmes? This question has not yet been discussed with regard to its theoretical and methodological implications. In clinical practice the decision has been based on the therapists evaluation. 105 patients, consecutively admitted in a psychosomatic hospital were interviewed with a screening questionnaire about their job related strains and the perceived interaction between symptomatology and job. According to the literature guidelines for inclusion of psychosomatic patients to a special work hardening programme were used. Therapists were asked to independently assign their patients to the programme. The overlap between the two procedures was small. While the guidelines focussed on a high level of job strain and the patient's motivation for a job-related therapeutic approach, the therapists' decision was based on duration of inability to work, impairments at work due to the symptoms, conflicts with colleagues at work and the patient's ability to perceive problems in a differentiated manner. Considering the problem of inclusion-criteria for a work hardening programme, the highly complex constellations behind routine therapeutic decisions in psychosomatic rehabilitation became evident. To integrate medical diagnosis, symptomatology, psychological models, job strain, the patient's social situation and values, is a neglected but important goal of rehabilitation sciences and should be a base for a concept guiding the development, evaluation and establishment of work related therapeutic programmes.
可能那些有职业疗法的病人,是怎样的呢?差别输入标准
针对身心康复工作相关问题提供特殊治疗方案的必要性日益明显。哪些病人应该参加这些项目?这个问题尚未就其理论和方法影响进行讨论。在临床实践中,决定是基于治疗师的评估。对105例连续入住某心身医院的患者进行工作压力及症状与工作相互作用的问卷调查。根据文献指南,纳入心身病人到一个特殊的工作硬化程序被使用。治疗师被要求独立地为他们的病人分配项目。这两个程序之间的重叠部分很小。虽然指导方针关注的是高水平的工作压力和患者对与工作相关的治疗方法的动机,但治疗师的决定是基于无法工作的持续时间、因症状造成的工作障碍、与同事的冲突以及患者以不同方式感知问题的能力。考虑到工作硬化计划的纳入标准问题,心身康复常规治疗决策背后的高度复杂的星座变得明显。整合医学诊断、症状学、心理模型、工作压力、患者的社会状况和价值观,是康复科学被忽视但重要的目标,应作为指导制定、评估和建立与工作相关的治疗方案的概念基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信