A Comparative Study About Coronary CTA for Patients with Arrhythmia under Different Time Phase One-Beat Scanning Mode

2021 IEEE 9th International Conference on Bioinformatics and Computational Biology (ICBCB) Pub Date : 2021-05-25 DOI:10.1109/ICBCB52223.2021.9459212

Dewu Yang, Wang Junying, Yin Hongxia, Yan Zixu

{"title":"A Comparative Study About Coronary CTA for Patients with Arrhythmia under Different Time Phase One-Beat Scanning Mode","authors":"Dewu Yang, Wang Junying, Yin Hongxia, Yan Zixu","doi":"10.1109/ICBCB52223.2021.9459212","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: The results of coronary CTA for patients with arrhythmia were compared under different phase One-Beat scanning mode. Methods: 100 patients with arrhythmia were selected and randomly divided into control group and observation group. The relative phase-scanning mode and absolute phase-scanning mode were used for examination. Subjective and objective evaluation methods were used for image quality analysis, while variance analysis and Spearman correlation analysis were used for statistical analysis. Results: The subjective scores of all 13 segments in the observation group were higher than those in the control group, and the differences in 6 segments were statistically significant (P<0.05). CNR values in 3 segments in the observation group were higher than those in the control group, with statistically significant differences (P< 0.05). In the observation group, the correlation between the evaluation data and heart rate was weak (0<r<0.3), while the correlation in the control group was significantly negative (- 0.8<r<-0.3). Conclusions: The image quality in the absolute time-phase scanning mode is better than that in the relative time-phase and is not affected by the heart rate. Therefore, the absolute time-phase scanning mode has a good application value in the CCTA for patients with arrhythmia.","PeriodicalId":178168,"journal":{"name":"2021 IEEE 9th International Conference on Bioinformatics and Computational Biology (ICBCB)","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 IEEE 9th International Conference on Bioinformatics and Computational Biology (ICBCB)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICBCB52223.2021.9459212","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objectives: The results of coronary CTA for patients with arrhythmia were compared under different phase One-Beat scanning mode. Methods: 100 patients with arrhythmia were selected and randomly divided into control group and observation group. The relative phase-scanning mode and absolute phase-scanning mode were used for examination. Subjective and objective evaluation methods were used for image quality analysis, while variance analysis and Spearman correlation analysis were used for statistical analysis. Results: The subjective scores of all 13 segments in the observation group were higher than those in the control group, and the differences in 6 segments were statistically significant (P<0.05). CNR values in 3 segments in the observation group were higher than those in the control group, with statistically significant differences (P< 0.05). In the observation group, the correlation between the evaluation data and heart rate was weak (0

查看原文本刊更多论文

不同时相单拍扫描方式对心律失常患者冠脉CTA的比较研究

目的:比较心律失常患者在不同阶段单拍扫描方式下的冠状动脉CTA检查结果。方法:选择100例心律失常患者，随机分为对照组和观察组。采用相对相位扫描方式和绝对相位扫描方式进行检测。图像质量分析采用主客观评价方法，统计分析采用方差分析和Spearman相关分析。结果:观察组患者13个节段主观评分均高于对照组，其中6个节段差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。观察组3个节段的CNR值均高于对照组，差异有统计学意义(P< 0.05)。观察组患者评价资料与心率相关性较弱(0

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

2021 IEEE 9th International Conference on Bioinformatics and Computational Biology (ICBCB)

自引率

0.00%

发文量

京公网安备 11010802042870号

Book学术文献互助群
群号：604180095