FIGHTING THE DISINFODEMIC: FACT- CHECKING MANAGEMENT OF HOAX COVID-19 IN INDONESIA

Dasrun Hidayat, Acep Rohendi, Deri Hanafy D, M. Christin, Nur’aeni Nur’aeni
{"title":"FIGHTING THE DISINFODEMIC: FACT- CHECKING MANAGEMENT OF HOAX COVID-19 IN INDONESIA","authors":"Dasrun Hidayat, Acep Rohendi, Deri Hanafy D, M. Christin, Nur’aeni Nur’aeni","doi":"10.14421/pjk.v15i2.1996","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Indonesia was currently fighting disinfodemic COVID-19. During this situation, several hoaxes related to COVID-19 were circulating. Of course, the hoax news makes people even more worried and afraid. One way to prove the facts in that news is through a fact-checking system. This system is intended to check facts and verify information so that the truth can be identified. Fact-checking needs to be known by the public to suppress the spread of hoax news, especially related to the circulation of COVID-19 in Indonesia. Based on this phenomenon, the purpose of this study is to determine the informants’ experience related to the fact-checking process. The study informant referred to Mafindo, an internationally licensed fact-checking agency. To answer the objective of the research, the researcher used an ethnographic study of public relations with a qualitative approach. The ethnographic study of public relations focuses on examining communication activity planning using analysis units of Insight, Strategic Program, Program Implementation, Action, and Reputation or the IPPAR Model. The results of this study indicate that the Mafindo fact checker interprets the fact-checking for COVID-19 news as important, to reduce public concerns. The lack of reference sources to be used as data and evidence of hoax news becomes a challenge when doing fact-checking. The fact-checking phases include data collection, sorting, analyzing, and checking the results before publishing them to the public. The discussion is an effort to maintain the credibility of the results, image, and reputation of the fact-checker institution.","PeriodicalId":143543,"journal":{"name":"Profetik: Jurnal Komunikasi","volume":"57 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Profetik: Jurnal Komunikasi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14421/pjk.v15i2.1996","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Indonesia was currently fighting disinfodemic COVID-19. During this situation, several hoaxes related to COVID-19 were circulating. Of course, the hoax news makes people even more worried and afraid. One way to prove the facts in that news is through a fact-checking system. This system is intended to check facts and verify information so that the truth can be identified. Fact-checking needs to be known by the public to suppress the spread of hoax news, especially related to the circulation of COVID-19 in Indonesia. Based on this phenomenon, the purpose of this study is to determine the informants’ experience related to the fact-checking process. The study informant referred to Mafindo, an internationally licensed fact-checking agency. To answer the objective of the research, the researcher used an ethnographic study of public relations with a qualitative approach. The ethnographic study of public relations focuses on examining communication activity planning using analysis units of Insight, Strategic Program, Program Implementation, Action, and Reputation or the IPPAR Model. The results of this study indicate that the Mafindo fact checker interprets the fact-checking for COVID-19 news as important, to reduce public concerns. The lack of reference sources to be used as data and evidence of hoax news becomes a challenge when doing fact-checking. The fact-checking phases include data collection, sorting, analyzing, and checking the results before publishing them to the public. The discussion is an effort to maintain the credibility of the results, image, and reputation of the fact-checker institution.
打击虚假传播:印度尼西亚对虚假COVID-19的事实核查管理
印度尼西亚目前正在与COVID-19作斗争。在这种情况下,一些与COVID-19有关的骗局正在流传。当然,恶作剧新闻让人们更加担心和害怕。证明新闻中的事实的一种方法是通过事实核查系统。该系统旨在检查事实和核实信息,以便查明真相。需要让公众了解事实核查,以抑制虚假新闻的传播,特别是与COVID-19在印度尼西亚的传播有关。基于这一现象,本研究的目的是确定与事实核查过程相关的举报人经验。该研究的举报人提到了国际上有执照的事实核查机构Mafindo。为了回答研究的目的,研究人员使用了一种定性方法的公共关系民族志研究。公共关系的民族志研究侧重于使用洞察力、战略计划、计划实施、行动和声誉或IPPAR模型的分析单元来检查沟通活动计划。本研究结果表明,马茵多事实核查员将COVID-19新闻的事实核查解释为重要,以减少公众的担忧。在进行事实核查时,缺乏可作为数据和证据的参考来源成为一个挑战。事实核查阶段包括数据收集、整理、分析和在向公众发布结果之前对结果进行核查。讨论是为了维护事实核查机构的结果、形象和声誉的可信度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信