Study on the Legal Consequences of Revocation of the Appellate Award in the Internal Appellate Mechanism for Arbitration

Yongxin Li
{"title":"Study on the Legal Consequences of Revocation of the Appellate Award in the Internal Appellate Mechanism for Arbitration","authors":"Yongxin Li","doi":"10.56397/slj.2022.12.02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The traditional principle of finality in arbitration has certain drawbacks, and the huge risk costs it may lead to make some international commercial parties no longer use arbitration as their first choice for dispute resolution. However, the appellate mechanism for arbitration is not yet well developed, and the legal consequences of revocation of the appellate award need to be further clarified. In this article, I will analyse the academic opinions in China and abroad, and discuss the validity of the appellate award and the original award, the validity of these two kinds of awards after the appellate award is set aside, and the understanding of the principle of “non bis in idem” after being revoked, so as to draw conclusions on how to determine the validity of the arbitration award after the appellate award is set aside under different circumstances. Based on analysis above, my suggestion is that the same dispute after the revocation of the appellate award should be arbitrated by entering into a new arbitration agreement or by bringing a lawsuit.","PeriodicalId":377631,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Law and Justice","volume":"49 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in Law and Justice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56397/slj.2022.12.02","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The traditional principle of finality in arbitration has certain drawbacks, and the huge risk costs it may lead to make some international commercial parties no longer use arbitration as their first choice for dispute resolution. However, the appellate mechanism for arbitration is not yet well developed, and the legal consequences of revocation of the appellate award need to be further clarified. In this article, I will analyse the academic opinions in China and abroad, and discuss the validity of the appellate award and the original award, the validity of these two kinds of awards after the appellate award is set aside, and the understanding of the principle of “non bis in idem” after being revoked, so as to draw conclusions on how to determine the validity of the arbitration award after the appellate award is set aside under different circumstances. Based on analysis above, my suggestion is that the same dispute after the revocation of the appellate award should be arbitrated by entering into a new arbitration agreement or by bringing a lawsuit.
内部仲裁上诉机制中撤销上诉裁决的法律后果研究
传统的仲裁终局原则存在一定的弊端,其巨大的风险成本可能导致一些国际商事当事人不再将仲裁作为解决争议的首选。然而,仲裁上诉机制尚不完善,上诉裁决撤销的法律后果有待进一步明确。本文将分析国内外的学术观点,对上诉裁决与原裁决的效力、上诉裁决撤销后这两类裁决的效力、被撤销后“一事不再理”原则的理解等问题进行探讨,从而对不同情况下上诉裁决撤销后如何确定仲裁裁决的效力得出结论。综上所述,我的建议是,在上诉裁决被撤销后,对于同样的争议,可以通过重新签订仲裁协议或提起诉讼的方式进行仲裁。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信