Detecting Sentiment Polarities with Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning and Deep Learning Algorithms

Thi Ben, N. Ravikumar R, Poorna Chandra Reddy Alla, G. Komala, Krishnanand Mishra
{"title":"Detecting Sentiment Polarities with Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning and Deep Learning Algorithms","authors":"Thi Ben, N. Ravikumar R, Poorna Chandra Reddy Alla, G. Komala, Krishnanand Mishra","doi":"10.1109/InCACCT57535.2023.10141741","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As technology develops, customer reviews are used to assess the quality of products due to the increasing number of selling products online. The extraction of useful minerals from reviews are extremely important for future buyers who are seeking thoughts and sentiments to help their decision-making. Sentiment polarity detection is the process of categorizing the emotions expressed with text, mainly to identify whether the subjectiveness of the writer’s attitude toward the product, or service is positive, neutral or negative. To decrease sentiment mistakes on increasingly complex training data, we deploy machine and hybrid learning models that integrate multiple types of deep neural networks in this study. Then, we apply TF-IDF vectorization for extraction of valuable information in reviews. The paper proposes the comparison of performance between machine learning models, deep learning models and the combination of deep learning models to discover the sentiment polarity on online product reviews. We use the dataset collected from an e-commerce website (Amazon), which includes various product reviews. The experimental results display that combination of deep learning models outperform more machine learning algorithms.","PeriodicalId":405272,"journal":{"name":"2023 International Conference on Advancement in Computation & Computer Technologies (InCACCT)","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2023 International Conference on Advancement in Computation & Computer Technologies (InCACCT)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/InCACCT57535.2023.10141741","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As technology develops, customer reviews are used to assess the quality of products due to the increasing number of selling products online. The extraction of useful minerals from reviews are extremely important for future buyers who are seeking thoughts and sentiments to help their decision-making. Sentiment polarity detection is the process of categorizing the emotions expressed with text, mainly to identify whether the subjectiveness of the writer’s attitude toward the product, or service is positive, neutral or negative. To decrease sentiment mistakes on increasingly complex training data, we deploy machine and hybrid learning models that integrate multiple types of deep neural networks in this study. Then, we apply TF-IDF vectorization for extraction of valuable information in reviews. The paper proposes the comparison of performance between machine learning models, deep learning models and the combination of deep learning models to discover the sentiment polarity on online product reviews. We use the dataset collected from an e-commerce website (Amazon), which includes various product reviews. The experimental results display that combination of deep learning models outperform more machine learning algorithms.
用机器学习和深度学习算法的比较分析检测情感极性
随着技术的发展,由于网上销售产品的数量越来越多,客户评论被用来评估产品的质量。从评论中提取有用的矿物质对未来的买家来说是极其重要的,因为他们正在寻找想法和情感来帮助他们做出决策。情感极性检测是对文本所表达的情感进行分类的过程,主要是识别作者对产品或服务态度的主观性是积极的、中性的还是消极的。为了减少日益复杂的训练数据上的情绪错误,我们在本研究中部署了集成多种类型深度神经网络的机器和混合学习模型。然后,我们应用TF-IDF矢量化来提取评论中有价值的信息。本文提出了机器学习模型、深度学习模型和深度学习模型组合的性能比较,以发现在线产品评论的情感极性。我们使用从电子商务网站(亚马逊)收集的数据集,其中包括各种产品评论。实验结果表明,深度学习模型的组合优于更多的机器学习算法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信