Risk Analysis Application in Aviation Sector with Intuitionistic Fuzzy TOPSIS Method

Ceren Ünlükal, M. Yücel
{"title":"Risk Analysis Application in Aviation Sector with Intuitionistic Fuzzy TOPSIS Method","authors":"Ceren Ünlükal, M. Yücel","doi":"10.13189/ujm.2021.090502","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA) is one of the risk analysis techniques often used in many industries to recognize, assess, and avoid potential failures. FMEA consists of occurrence (O), severity (S) and detectability (D) of failures and by multiplying these components, the risk priority number (RPN) is obtained. The RPN value is an indicator used in prioritizing failures. Although FMEA is an analytical technique with strengths, such as helping to identify and reduce potential risks in processes and products, and being widely used, it has been criticized at some points. The main criticism is that different failures have the similar risk priority values and the same risk factor weight. Using FMEA alone may be insufficient in prioritizing the failures. It is not easy to appoint a mathematical number between 1 and 10 to O, S and D risk factors by the experts and decision makers who make the risk assessment. At this point, the use of linguistic variables offered by the intuitionistic fuzzy logic approach provides convenience to decision makers and increases the accuracy of risk assessments. This study purposes to assess the risks that may arise throughout the production process of a company operating in the aviation industry with FMEA. Considering the possibility that risk factors are ignored and risk priorities cannot be determined correctly, intuitionistic fuzzy logic approach is integrated into the study. For this purpose, risk factors have been weighted by experts. In problem solving, failures have been prioritized by experts with the support of linguistic variables by using the Intuitionistic Fuzzy TOPSIS method.","PeriodicalId":211193,"journal":{"name":"Universal journal of management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Universal journal of management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13189/ujm.2021.090502","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA) is one of the risk analysis techniques often used in many industries to recognize, assess, and avoid potential failures. FMEA consists of occurrence (O), severity (S) and detectability (D) of failures and by multiplying these components, the risk priority number (RPN) is obtained. The RPN value is an indicator used in prioritizing failures. Although FMEA is an analytical technique with strengths, such as helping to identify and reduce potential risks in processes and products, and being widely used, it has been criticized at some points. The main criticism is that different failures have the similar risk priority values and the same risk factor weight. Using FMEA alone may be insufficient in prioritizing the failures. It is not easy to appoint a mathematical number between 1 and 10 to O, S and D risk factors by the experts and decision makers who make the risk assessment. At this point, the use of linguistic variables offered by the intuitionistic fuzzy logic approach provides convenience to decision makers and increases the accuracy of risk assessments. This study purposes to assess the risks that may arise throughout the production process of a company operating in the aviation industry with FMEA. Considering the possibility that risk factors are ignored and risk priorities cannot be determined correctly, intuitionistic fuzzy logic approach is integrated into the study. For this purpose, risk factors have been weighted by experts. In problem solving, failures have been prioritized by experts with the support of linguistic variables by using the Intuitionistic Fuzzy TOPSIS method.
直觉模糊TOPSIS法在航空领域风险分析中的应用
失效模式和影响分析(FMEA)是一种风险分析技术,在许多行业中经常用于识别、评估和避免潜在的故障。FMEA由故障的发生率(O)、严重性(S)和可检测性(D)组成,通过将这些组成部分相乘,得到风险优先级数(RPN)。RPN值是用于确定故障优先级的指示器。尽管FMEA是一种具有优势的分析技术,例如帮助识别和减少过程和产品中的潜在风险,并且被广泛使用,但它在某些方面受到了批评。主要的批评是不同的故障具有相似的风险优先级值和相同的风险因子权重。仅使用FMEA可能不足以确定故障的优先级。对于进行风险评估的专家和决策者来说,给0、S、D三个风险因素指定一个1到10之间的数学数字是不容易的。在这一点上,使用直觉模糊逻辑方法提供的语言变量为决策者提供了方便,并提高了风险评估的准确性。本研究旨在评估在航空工业中使用FMEA的公司在整个生产过程中可能出现的风险。考虑到风险因素可能被忽略,无法正确确定风险优先级,将直觉模糊逻辑方法纳入研究。为此,专家们对风险因素进行了加权。在问题解决中,专家利用直觉模糊TOPSIS方法在语言变量的支持下对故障进行优先排序。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信