Comparison of the Short-Term Outcomes of Cementless Bipolar Hemiarthroplasty and Cementless Total Hip Arthroplasty for Displaced Femoral Neck Fractures in the Elderly

Wiboon Wanitcharoenporn, Nattapong Sasipotiwan, Witoon Thremthakanpol, Burin Sutthapakti
{"title":"Comparison of the Short-Term Outcomes of Cementless Bipolar Hemiarthroplasty and Cementless Total Hip Arthroplasty for Displaced Femoral Neck Fractures in the Elderly","authors":"Wiboon Wanitcharoenporn, Nattapong Sasipotiwan, Witoon Thremthakanpol, Burin Sutthapakti","doi":"10.56929/jseaortho-022-0166","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: Displaced femoral neck fracture (DFNF) in elderly patients are frequently managed by hip replacement. However there is no consensus on bipolar hemiarthroplasty (BHA), which has a lower dislocation rate, less blood loss and shorter operative time, while total hip arthroplasty (THA) provides better functional and long term outcomes. This study aimed to evaluate patient function and complications following both BHA and THA in an elderly population who presented with DFNF.\nMethods: A prospective, randomized controlled trial comparing BHA and THA for DFNF treatment was performed. Patients over 60 years of age with DFNF (Garden’s classification types 3 and 4) participated in this study, while patients with preexisting hip conditions and impaired cognitive function were excluded from the study. All operations were performed by a single surgeon using the same techniques the posterior approach. Demographic data, intraoperative blood loss, operative time, and morbidity and mortality statistics were collected. Patients were followed up at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months and their functional scores were calculated according to the Harris hip score. Statistical analyses were performed to the intention-to-treat principle.\nResults: The cohort comprised 75 patients, with 38 patients in the BHA group (mean age 76.7 years) and 37 patients in the THA group (mean age75.7 years). The mean operative times for the BHA and THA groups were 40.76 and 51.08 minutes respectively. The average intraoperative blood loss was 200 cc and 279.7 cc, respectively. The mean hospital stay was 5.07 days for the BHA group and 4.92 days for the THA group. The mean Harris hip scores at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months in the BHA group were 71.5, 78, 85 and 86, respectively, while in those in the THA group were 71, 79, 85.5 and 88 respectively. Statistically, there were no significant difference between the two groups. Morbidities including fractures and dislocations, and mortality rates, also showed no statistically significant difference.\nConclusions: Harris hip score, dislocation, length of hospital stay and mortality rate at one year is not statistically different between group. Blood loss and operative time were significantly lower in the BHA group than in the THA group.","PeriodicalId":333749,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Southeast Asian Orthopaedics","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Southeast Asian Orthopaedics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56929/jseaortho-022-0166","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Displaced femoral neck fracture (DFNF) in elderly patients are frequently managed by hip replacement. However there is no consensus on bipolar hemiarthroplasty (BHA), which has a lower dislocation rate, less blood loss and shorter operative time, while total hip arthroplasty (THA) provides better functional and long term outcomes. This study aimed to evaluate patient function and complications following both BHA and THA in an elderly population who presented with DFNF. Methods: A prospective, randomized controlled trial comparing BHA and THA for DFNF treatment was performed. Patients over 60 years of age with DFNF (Garden’s classification types 3 and 4) participated in this study, while patients with preexisting hip conditions and impaired cognitive function were excluded from the study. All operations were performed by a single surgeon using the same techniques the posterior approach. Demographic data, intraoperative blood loss, operative time, and morbidity and mortality statistics were collected. Patients were followed up at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months and their functional scores were calculated according to the Harris hip score. Statistical analyses were performed to the intention-to-treat principle. Results: The cohort comprised 75 patients, with 38 patients in the BHA group (mean age 76.7 years) and 37 patients in the THA group (mean age75.7 years). The mean operative times for the BHA and THA groups were 40.76 and 51.08 minutes respectively. The average intraoperative blood loss was 200 cc and 279.7 cc, respectively. The mean hospital stay was 5.07 days for the BHA group and 4.92 days for the THA group. The mean Harris hip scores at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months in the BHA group were 71.5, 78, 85 and 86, respectively, while in those in the THA group were 71, 79, 85.5 and 88 respectively. Statistically, there were no significant difference between the two groups. Morbidities including fractures and dislocations, and mortality rates, also showed no statistically significant difference. Conclusions: Harris hip score, dislocation, length of hospital stay and mortality rate at one year is not statistically different between group. Blood loss and operative time were significantly lower in the BHA group than in the THA group.
无骨水泥双极半关节置换术与无骨水泥全髋关节置换术治疗老年移位性股骨颈骨折的短期疗效比较
目的:老年患者移位性股骨颈骨折(DFNF)常采用髋关节置换术治疗。然而,双极半关节置换术(BHA)脱位率更低,出血量更少,手术时间更短,而全髋关节置换术(THA)具有更好的功能和长期预后,目前尚无共识。本研究旨在评估老年DFNF患者在BHA和THA后的功能和并发症。方法:采用前瞻性随机对照试验,比较BHA和THA治疗DFNF的疗效。60岁以上的DFNF患者(Garden’s classification types 3和4)参与了本研究,而既往存在髋关节疾病和认知功能受损的患者被排除在研究之外。所有手术均由同一位外科医生采用相同的技术进行后路手术。收集人口统计学资料、术中出血量、手术时间、发病率和死亡率统计数据。随访1、3、6、12个月,根据Harris髋关节评分计算功能评分。对意向治疗原则进行统计分析。结果:该队列共75例患者,BHA组38例(平均年龄76.7岁),THA组37例(平均年龄75.7岁)。BHA组和THA组的平均手术时间分别为40.76和51.08分钟。术中平均失血量分别为200cc和279.7 cc。BHA组平均住院时间5.07天,THA组平均住院时间4.92天。BHA组1、3、6和12个月Harris髋关节平均评分分别为71.5、78、85和86,THA组分别为71、79、85.5和88。统计学上,两组间无显著差异。包括骨折和脱位在内的发病率以及死亡率也没有统计学上的显著差异。结论:Harris髋关节评分、脱位、住院时间及1年死亡率组间差异无统计学意义。BHA组出血量和手术时间明显低于THA组。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信