D Arvidsson, S Lindgren, P Almqvist, K E Andersson, U Haglund
{"title":"Role of the renin-angiotensin system in liver blood flow reduction produced by positive end-expiratory pressure ventilation.","authors":"D Arvidsson, S Lindgren, P Almqvist, K E Andersson, U Haglund","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP), often used in critically ill patients, reduces cardiac output, and its adverse effects on splanchnic circulation imply a risk of regional secondary organ failure. To investigate if the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) mediates PEEP-induced circulatory changes, hemodynamic effects of PEEP were measured in four groups of pigs: controls (C), nephrectomized (N), or given enalaprilate, an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (E), or saralasin, a competitive inhibitor of angiotensin II (S). Groups N, E and S represented interference with RAS effects at different sites. With PEEP at 10 cmH2O, mean arterial pressure, cardiac index, portal venous and hepatic arterial blood flow decreased in all groups, while portal and central venous pressures rose, without significant intergroup difference. Systemic and preportal bloodflow resistance increased in groups S and N, and hepatic arterial resistance in group C. Accentuation of the flow and pressure changes occurred with 20 cm PEEP in all groups, with increase of systemic and hepatic resistance in S and N, or preportal resistance in group N and protal resistance in group C. The study suggested that RAS is not a major mediator of PEEP-induced circulatory changes. Differing responses within groups N, S and E may have been due to interference with the action of RAS and of other vasoactive substances.</p>","PeriodicalId":7005,"journal":{"name":"Acta chirurgica Scandinavica","volume":"156 5","pages":"353-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1990-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta chirurgica Scandinavica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP), often used in critically ill patients, reduces cardiac output, and its adverse effects on splanchnic circulation imply a risk of regional secondary organ failure. To investigate if the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) mediates PEEP-induced circulatory changes, hemodynamic effects of PEEP were measured in four groups of pigs: controls (C), nephrectomized (N), or given enalaprilate, an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (E), or saralasin, a competitive inhibitor of angiotensin II (S). Groups N, E and S represented interference with RAS effects at different sites. With PEEP at 10 cmH2O, mean arterial pressure, cardiac index, portal venous and hepatic arterial blood flow decreased in all groups, while portal and central venous pressures rose, without significant intergroup difference. Systemic and preportal bloodflow resistance increased in groups S and N, and hepatic arterial resistance in group C. Accentuation of the flow and pressure changes occurred with 20 cm PEEP in all groups, with increase of systemic and hepatic resistance in S and N, or preportal resistance in group N and protal resistance in group C. The study suggested that RAS is not a major mediator of PEEP-induced circulatory changes. Differing responses within groups N, S and E may have been due to interference with the action of RAS and of other vasoactive substances.
呼气末正压(PEEP)常用于危重患者,可减少心排血量,其对内脏循环的不良影响意味着局部继发性器官衰竭的风险。为了研究肾素-血管紧张素系统(RAS)是否介导PEEP诱导的循环变化,研究人员在四组猪中测量了PEEP的血流动力学影响:对照组(C),肾切除组(N),或给予依那普利酸(一种血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂(E)或萨拉拉西素(一种血管紧张素II的竞争性抑制剂)。N组,E组和S组代表了不同部位对RAS作用的干扰。PEEP在10 cmH2O时,各组平均动脉压、心脏指数、门静脉和肝动脉血流均下降,门静脉和中心静脉压升高,组间差异无统计学意义。S组和N组全身和门静脉前血流阻力增加,c组肝动脉阻力增加。所有组在20 cm PEEP时血流和压力变化都加重,S组和N组全身和肝脏阻力增加,N组门静脉前阻力增加,c组门静脉阻力增加。研究提示RAS不是PEEP诱导的循环变化的主要介质。N组、S组和E组的不同反应可能是由于RAS和其他血管活性物质的作用受到干扰。