Detection of antibodies to cytomegalovirus by immunofluorescence and enzyme immunoassay.

Czechoslovak medicine Pub Date : 1990-01-01
L Korcáková, J Kaslík, I Slízová
{"title":"Detection of antibodies to cytomegalovirus by immunofluorescence and enzyme immunoassay.","authors":"L Korcáková,&nbsp;J Kaslík,&nbsp;I Slízová","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Immunofluorescence assay (IFA) and enzyme immunoassay (EIA) for detection of immunoglobulin M (IgM) to cytomegalovirus (CMV) correlated in 88.9%. All but one differences were due to negativity in IFA and positivity in EIA. The agreement between determination of immunoglobulin G (IgG) to CMV by IFA and determination of total antibodies to CMV by EIA was 89.9%. All the differences were due to a mild positivity in IFA and negativity in EIA. The advantage of EIA is in its objective colorimetric evaluation of test results excluding a subjective underestimation or overestimation of the reaction. In addition, EIA gives the result of IgM detection already in 6 hours, while IFA as late as in 24 hours.</p>","PeriodicalId":75772,"journal":{"name":"Czechoslovak medicine","volume":"13 1","pages":"29-33"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1990-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Czechoslovak medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Immunofluorescence assay (IFA) and enzyme immunoassay (EIA) for detection of immunoglobulin M (IgM) to cytomegalovirus (CMV) correlated in 88.9%. All but one differences were due to negativity in IFA and positivity in EIA. The agreement between determination of immunoglobulin G (IgG) to CMV by IFA and determination of total antibodies to CMV by EIA was 89.9%. All the differences were due to a mild positivity in IFA and negativity in EIA. The advantage of EIA is in its objective colorimetric evaluation of test results excluding a subjective underestimation or overestimation of the reaction. In addition, EIA gives the result of IgM detection already in 6 hours, while IFA as late as in 24 hours.

免疫荧光法和酶免疫分析法检测巨细胞病毒抗体。
免疫荧光法(IFA)与酶免疫法(EIA)检测巨细胞病毒(CMV)免疫球蛋白M (IgM)的相关性为88.9%。除1个差异外,其余均为IFA阴性和EIA阳性。IFA法测定CMV免疫球蛋白G (IgG)与EIA法测定CMV总抗体的符合率为89.9%。所有的差异都是由于IFA的轻度阳性和EIA的阴性。环境影响评估的优势在于其对测试结果的客观比色评价,排除了对反应的主观低估或高估。此外,EIA可在6小时内给出IgM检测结果,而IFA可在24小时后给出。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信