Creative Destruction, Bureaucratic Organization, or Evolutionary Recombination? An Exercise in Strategic Foresight Based on the History of the Bio-Pharmaceutical Industry

C. Reschke
{"title":"Creative Destruction, Bureaucratic Organization, or Evolutionary Recombination? An Exercise in Strategic Foresight Based on the History of the Bio-Pharmaceutical Industry","authors":"C. Reschke","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1571918","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Schumpeter had initially argued that the capitalist process is a process of the creative destruction of established industries by new combinations of resources and technologies by entrepreneurs. In contrast, observations of large scale projects in the second world war led him to argue that R&D will be increasingly organized in large bureaucratic units. However, today, the organization of pharmaceutical research in large units and the integration of new technologies is a problematic process. Pharmaceutical companies are under pressure from a seeming lack of innovative output and resultant financial constraints. Therefore one example of a case where the relevant processes of both positions of Schumpeter are at work is the competition between companies based on new and on established technologies in the bio-pharmaceutical realm. Based on a historically informed analysis of the bio-pharmaceutical industry in the domains of markets and regulation, strategy, research and development, and mergers and acquisition we discuss forces affecting the outcome between creative destruction and bureaucratic organization for the bio-pharmaceutical industry.","PeriodicalId":239416,"journal":{"name":"ERPN: Imitation & Innovation (Sub-Topic)","volume":"40 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERPN: Imitation & Innovation (Sub-Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1571918","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Schumpeter had initially argued that the capitalist process is a process of the creative destruction of established industries by new combinations of resources and technologies by entrepreneurs. In contrast, observations of large scale projects in the second world war led him to argue that R&D will be increasingly organized in large bureaucratic units. However, today, the organization of pharmaceutical research in large units and the integration of new technologies is a problematic process. Pharmaceutical companies are under pressure from a seeming lack of innovative output and resultant financial constraints. Therefore one example of a case where the relevant processes of both positions of Schumpeter are at work is the competition between companies based on new and on established technologies in the bio-pharmaceutical realm. Based on a historically informed analysis of the bio-pharmaceutical industry in the domains of markets and regulation, strategy, research and development, and mergers and acquisition we discuss forces affecting the outcome between creative destruction and bureaucratic organization for the bio-pharmaceutical industry.
创造性破坏,官僚组织,还是进化重组?基于生物制药产业历史的战略预见实践
熊彼特最初认为,资本主义过程是企业家通过资源和技术的新组合创造性地破坏现有产业的过程。相比之下,对第二次世界大战中大规模项目的观察使他认为,研发将越来越多地组织在大型官僚单位中。然而,今天,在大型单位组织药物研究和新技术的整合是一个有问题的过程。制药公司正面临着似乎缺乏创新产出和由此产生的财务限制的压力。因此,熊彼特的两个立场的相关过程都在起作用的一个例子是,生物制药领域基于新技术和现有技术的公司之间的竞争。基于对生物制药行业在市场和监管、战略、研发和并购等领域的历史分析,我们讨论了影响生物制药行业创造性破坏和官僚组织之间结果的力量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信