{"title":"Feasibility of Morphing-Attacks in Vascular Biometrics","authors":"Altan K. Aydemir, Jutta Hämmerle-Uhl, A. Uhl","doi":"10.1109/IJCB52358.2021.9484372","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"For the first time, the feasibility of creating morphed samples for attacking vascular biometrics is investigated, in particular finger vein recognition schemes are addressed. A conducted vulnerability analysis reveals that (i) the extent of vulnerability, (ii) the type of most vulnerable recognition scheme, and (iii) the preferred way to determine the best morph sample for a given target sample depends on the employed sensor. Digital morphs represent a significant threat as vulnerability in terms of IAPMR is often found to be > 0.8 or > 0.6 (in sensor dependent manner). Physical artefacts created from these morphs lead to clearly lower vulnerability (with IAPMR ≤ 0.25), however, this has to be attributed to the low quality of the artefacts (and is expected be increase for better artefact quality).","PeriodicalId":175984,"journal":{"name":"2021 IEEE International Joint Conference on Biometrics (IJCB)","volume":"37 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 IEEE International Joint Conference on Biometrics (IJCB)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IJCB52358.2021.9484372","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
For the first time, the feasibility of creating morphed samples for attacking vascular biometrics is investigated, in particular finger vein recognition schemes are addressed. A conducted vulnerability analysis reveals that (i) the extent of vulnerability, (ii) the type of most vulnerable recognition scheme, and (iii) the preferred way to determine the best morph sample for a given target sample depends on the employed sensor. Digital morphs represent a significant threat as vulnerability in terms of IAPMR is often found to be > 0.8 or > 0.6 (in sensor dependent manner). Physical artefacts created from these morphs lead to clearly lower vulnerability (with IAPMR ≤ 0.25), however, this has to be attributed to the low quality of the artefacts (and is expected be increase for better artefact quality).