Anti-Preference in Employment Law: A Preliminary Analysis

Allen R. Kamp
{"title":"Anti-Preference in Employment Law: A Preliminary Analysis","authors":"Allen R. Kamp","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2786110","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There are bans on a ban on preferences based on these categories to the already existing ban on discrimination. Characterized as being anti-affirmative action, these proposals have been debated in terms of their constitutionality and desirability. This Article will analyze these proposals and basic legal questions. This Article finds that such statutes could change present law on employment and educational selection in unforeseen ways. Many now-current practices as diverse as favoring one's lover, hiring co-ethnics for a small ethnic firm, and admitting legacies into college could be illegal. It concludes that the proposals make an unstated and erroneous assumption that anti-preference rules are anti-affirmative action practices, which they often are not, and that anti-preference and anti-affirmative action equals a merit selection system, which it does not.","PeriodicalId":411033,"journal":{"name":"Chicana/o-Latina/o Law Review","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1996-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chicana/o-Latina/o Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2786110","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There are bans on a ban on preferences based on these categories to the already existing ban on discrimination. Characterized as being anti-affirmative action, these proposals have been debated in terms of their constitutionality and desirability. This Article will analyze these proposals and basic legal questions. This Article finds that such statutes could change present law on employment and educational selection in unforeseen ways. Many now-current practices as diverse as favoring one's lover, hiring co-ethnics for a small ethnic firm, and admitting legacies into college could be illegal. It concludes that the proposals make an unstated and erroneous assumption that anti-preference rules are anti-affirmative action practices, which they often are not, and that anti-preference and anti-affirmative action equals a merit selection system, which it does not.
就业法中的反优惠:初步分析
除了已经存在的禁止歧视之外,还有禁止基于这些类别的偏好的禁令。这些提案被认为是反平权行动,在其合宪性和可取性方面进行了辩论。本文将对这些建议和基本法律问题进行分析。本文认为,这些法规可能以不可预见的方式改变现行的就业和教育选择法律。很多现在流行的做法都是违法的,比如偏袒自己的爱人,为一家小型的少数民族公司雇佣同种族的人,以及允许后代进入大学。它的结论是,这些提案做出了一个未明确且错误的假设,即反优惠规则是反平权行动的做法,而事实往往并非如此,而且反优惠和反平权行动等于择优选拔制度,而事实并非如此。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信