Can Energy Commodities Affect Energy Blockchain-Based Cryptos?

Ikhlaas Gurrib
{"title":"Can Energy Commodities Affect Energy Blockchain-Based Cryptos?","authors":"Ikhlaas Gurrib","doi":"10.1108/SEF-10-2018-0313","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThe purpose of this paper is to shed fresh light into whether an energy commodity price index (ENFX) and energy blockchain-based crypto price index (ENCX) can be used to predict movements in the energy commodity and energy crypto market.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nUsing principal component analysis over daily data of crude oil, heating oil, natural gas and energy based cryptos, the ENFX and ENCX indices are constructed, where ENFX (ENCX) represents 94% (88%) of variability in energy commodity (energy crypto) prices.\n\n\nFindings\nNatural gas price movements were better explained by ENCX, and shared positive (negative) correlations with cryptos (crude oil and heating oil). Using a vector autoregressive model (VAR), while the 1-day lagged ENCX (ENFX) was significant in estimating current ENCX (ENFX) values, only lagged ENCX was significant in estimating current ENFX. Granger causality tests confirmed the two markets do not granger cause each other. One standard deviation shock in ENFX had a negative effect on ENCX. Weak forecasting results of the VAR model, support the two markets are not robust forecasters of each other. Robustness wise, the VAR model ranked lower than an autoregressive model, but higher than a random walk model.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nSignificant structural breaks at distinct dates in the two markets reinforce that the two markets do not help to predict each other. The findings are limited by the existence of bubbles (December 2017-January 2018) which were witnessed in energy blockchain-based crypto markets and natural gas, but not in crude oil and heating oil.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nAs per the authors’ knowledge, this is the first paper to analyze the relationship between leading energy commodities and energy blockchain-based crypto markets.\n","PeriodicalId":385335,"journal":{"name":"Cryptocurrencies eJournal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"16","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cryptocurrencies eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/SEF-10-2018-0313","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to shed fresh light into whether an energy commodity price index (ENFX) and energy blockchain-based crypto price index (ENCX) can be used to predict movements in the energy commodity and energy crypto market. Design/methodology/approach Using principal component analysis over daily data of crude oil, heating oil, natural gas and energy based cryptos, the ENFX and ENCX indices are constructed, where ENFX (ENCX) represents 94% (88%) of variability in energy commodity (energy crypto) prices. Findings Natural gas price movements were better explained by ENCX, and shared positive (negative) correlations with cryptos (crude oil and heating oil). Using a vector autoregressive model (VAR), while the 1-day lagged ENCX (ENFX) was significant in estimating current ENCX (ENFX) values, only lagged ENCX was significant in estimating current ENFX. Granger causality tests confirmed the two markets do not granger cause each other. One standard deviation shock in ENFX had a negative effect on ENCX. Weak forecasting results of the VAR model, support the two markets are not robust forecasters of each other. Robustness wise, the VAR model ranked lower than an autoregressive model, but higher than a random walk model. Research limitations/implications Significant structural breaks at distinct dates in the two markets reinforce that the two markets do not help to predict each other. The findings are limited by the existence of bubbles (December 2017-January 2018) which were witnessed in energy blockchain-based crypto markets and natural gas, but not in crude oil and heating oil. Originality/value As per the authors’ knowledge, this is the first paper to analyze the relationship between leading energy commodities and energy blockchain-based crypto markets.
能源商品会影响基于能源区块链的加密货币吗?
本文的目的是揭示能源商品价格指数(ENFX)和基于能源区块链的加密价格指数(ENCX)是否可用于预测能源商品和能源加密市场的走势。通过对原油、取暖油、天然气和基于能源的加密货币的日常数据进行主成分分析,构建了ENFX和ENCX指数,其中ENFX (ENCX)代表能源商品(能源加密货币)价格变化的94%(88%)。天然气价格变动可以用ENCX更好地解释,并与加密货币(原油和取暖油)呈正(负)相关。使用向量自回归模型(VAR),虽然滞后1天的ENCX (ENFX)在估计当前ENCX (ENFX)值方面具有显著性,但只有滞后的ENCX在估计当前ENFX方面具有显著性。格兰杰因果检验证实了两个市场之间不存在格兰杰因果关系。ENFX中的一个标准差冲击对ENCX有负面影响。VAR模型的弱预测结果,支持了两个市场对对方的不稳健预测。鲁棒性方面,VAR模型排名低于自回归模型,但高于随机游走模型。研究局限/启示两个市场在不同日期的显著结构性断裂强化了两个市场无法相互预测。这些发现受到泡沫存在的限制(2017年12月至2018年1月),这些泡沫出现在基于区块链的能源加密市场和天然气中,但没有出现在原油和取暖油中。据作者所知,这是第一篇分析主要能源商品与基于能源区块链的加密市场之间关系的论文。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信