Chinese Version of VEINES-QOL/Sym Questionnaire in Chinese Patients with Deep Venous Thrombosis: Cultural Adaptation and Psychometric Properties

Fengling Li, Ya-li Wang, Xue-mei Wei, S. Du, Shenglian Duan, Guolu Jiang, Lijun Cui, Fang Tang, Liping Wei, Mengjiao Yang, Rong Chen
{"title":"Chinese Version of VEINES-QOL/Sym Questionnaire in Chinese Patients with Deep Venous Thrombosis: Cultural Adaptation and Psychometric Properties","authors":"Fengling Li, Ya-li Wang, Xue-mei Wei, S. Du, Shenglian Duan, Guolu Jiang, Lijun Cui, Fang Tang, Liping Wei, Mengjiao Yang, Rong Chen","doi":"10.18282/l-e.v10i8.3047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose:To verify the psychometrical properties of the Chinese-version VEnous INsufficiency Epidemiological \nand Economic Study-Quality of Life/Symptoms (VEINES-QOL/Sym) questionnaire, in Chinese patients with deep venous \nthrombosis.Methods:The English-version VEINES-QOL/Sym questionnaire was translated into Chinese by forward-translation, \nback-translation and cultural adjustment, and approved by the original authors. It was administered to patients with deep \nvenous thrombosis of the two local hospitals in Nanchong from Jul 2017 to Jan 2018. The internal consistency reliability and \nconstruct validity of the Chinese version of VEINES-QOL/Sym questionnaire were evaluated. Main outcome measures were \nas follows: Reliability was tested using Cronbach’s alpha coefficient, internal consistency reliability, retest reliability, split-half \nreliability . Validity was verified by structure validity, content validity and criterion-related validity.Results:In pilot study, a total \nof 132 participates completed the questionnaire. In validity sample, a total of 335 participates completed the questionnaire. The \nChinese-version VEINES-QOL/Sym questionnaire has 25 items. And it had good internal consistency and stability (Cronbach’s \nα coefficients ranging from 0.877-0.930, split-half coefficients ranging from 0.792-0.913 and retest coefficients ranging from \n0.891-0.987). The Chinese-version VEINES-QOL/Sym summary score had good criterion-related validity in the PCS (physical \ncomponent summary) and MCS (mental component summary) of Chinese-version SF-36 (0.801 and 0.792). Four factors emerged \nfrom exploratory factor analysis, which named symptoms (Q1a-i, Q6), physical functioning (Q2, Q3a-d), role-physical (Q4a-d, \nQ5) and mental health (Q7a-e) respectively. ConclusionsThis questionnaire was shown to be reliable and valid in the Chinese \nlanguage. We propose that the Chinese-version VEINES-QOL/Sym is a useful tool for local use.","PeriodicalId":199440,"journal":{"name":"Learning & Education","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Learning & Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18282/l-e.v10i8.3047","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose:To verify the psychometrical properties of the Chinese-version VEnous INsufficiency Epidemiological and Economic Study-Quality of Life/Symptoms (VEINES-QOL/Sym) questionnaire, in Chinese patients with deep venous thrombosis.Methods:The English-version VEINES-QOL/Sym questionnaire was translated into Chinese by forward-translation, back-translation and cultural adjustment, and approved by the original authors. It was administered to patients with deep venous thrombosis of the two local hospitals in Nanchong from Jul 2017 to Jan 2018. The internal consistency reliability and construct validity of the Chinese version of VEINES-QOL/Sym questionnaire were evaluated. Main outcome measures were as follows: Reliability was tested using Cronbach’s alpha coefficient, internal consistency reliability, retest reliability, split-half reliability . Validity was verified by structure validity, content validity and criterion-related validity.Results:In pilot study, a total of 132 participates completed the questionnaire. In validity sample, a total of 335 participates completed the questionnaire. The Chinese-version VEINES-QOL/Sym questionnaire has 25 items. And it had good internal consistency and stability (Cronbach’s α coefficients ranging from 0.877-0.930, split-half coefficients ranging from 0.792-0.913 and retest coefficients ranging from 0.891-0.987). The Chinese-version VEINES-QOL/Sym summary score had good criterion-related validity in the PCS (physical component summary) and MCS (mental component summary) of Chinese-version SF-36 (0.801 and 0.792). Four factors emerged from exploratory factor analysis, which named symptoms (Q1a-i, Q6), physical functioning (Q2, Q3a-d), role-physical (Q4a-d, Q5) and mental health (Q7a-e) respectively. ConclusionsThis questionnaire was shown to be reliable and valid in the Chinese language. We propose that the Chinese-version VEINES-QOL/Sym is a useful tool for local use.
中国深静脉血栓患者VEINES-QOL/Sym问卷:文化适应和心理测量特征
目的:验证中文版静脉功能不全流行病学与经济研究-生活质量/症状(VEINES-QOL/Sym)问卷在中国深静脉血栓患者中的心理测量学特征。方法:将英文VEINES-QOL/Sym问卷通过正译、反译、文化调整等方法翻译成中文,并经原作者审核通过。于2017年7月至2018年1月对南充市两家地方医院深静脉血栓患者进行治疗。对中文版VEINES-QOL/Sym问卷进行内部一致性、信度和结构效度评价。主要结果测量方法如下:信度采用Cronbach’s alpha系数、内部一致性信度、重测信度、分半信度进行检验。效度以结构效度、内容效度和标度相关效度进行验证。结果:在试点研究中,共有132名参与者完成了问卷调查。在效度样本中,共有335名参与者完成了问卷。中文版VEINES-QOL/Sym问卷共25项。具有良好的内部一致性和稳定性(Cronbach 's α系数为0.877 ~ 0.930,劈裂系数为0.792 ~ 0.913,重测系数为0.891 ~ 0.987)。中文版的VEINES-QOL/Sym总结评分在中文版SF-36的身体成分摘要(PCS)和心理成分摘要(MCS)中具有较好的标度相关效度(0.801和0.792)。探索性因素分析得出四个因素,分别命名为症状(Q1a-i, Q6)、身体功能(Q2, Q3a-d)、角色-身体(Q4a-d, Q5)和心理健康(Q7a-e)。结论该问卷具有较高的中文信度和效度。我们建议中文版的VEINES-QOL/Sym在本地使用是一个有用的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信