Mechanical Behavior Investigation of UHMWPE Composites for Pile Cushion Applications

Viewvana Tulatorn, S. Ouajai, R. Yeetsorn, N. Chanunpanich
{"title":"Mechanical Behavior Investigation of UHMWPE Composites for Pile Cushion Applications","authors":"Viewvana Tulatorn, S. Ouajai, R. Yeetsorn, N. Chanunpanich","doi":"10.14416/j.ijast.2015.08.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Presently, there is no specific guiding principle on the utilization of polymeric composites as a pile cushion pad. There is a prerequisite consequently to understand their mechanical behavior during a pile driving process. Hence, this article is concerned with the observations of mechanical behavior under cyclic loading application, compressive strength, coefficient of restitution, and permanent deformation of ultrahigh molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) and activated carbon (AC) composites. UHMWPE/AC composites containing 1, 3, 5, 10 and 20 wt% of AC concentrations were prepared for accomplishing the aim. Prior to those characterizations, the composites were compression molded under 160oC for various operating times (5 to 40 minutes). As a comparison to UHMWPE, applying AC into UHMWPE matrix significantly reduced the cycle time of the compression molding. Compressive strength at 80% deformation, tangent modulus and coefficient of restitution of UHMWPE were inferior to those properties of UHMWPE/AC composites. In terms of the coefficient of restitution, the coefficient values of composites were obviously higher than UHMWPE’s values. Moreover, the coefficient of restitution at 8,000 N/min of all samples was greater than a represented coefficient from the test at 2,000 N/min. UHMWPE/AC composites with 10 wt% of AC loading provided the best mechanically reversible performance. Experimental results also indicated that the mechanical property enhancement associated with an increase in UHMWPE’s molecular weight, while the creep strain of UHMWPE was affected by the applied amount of AC. Permanent deformation data illustrated that the increasing cycles of compression urged the deterioration as same as the results measured via cyclic compression testing. In overview, UHMWPE/AC composites showed a promise for future opportunities as a viable option in replacing a traditional material for manufacturing a pile cushion pad.","PeriodicalId":352801,"journal":{"name":"King Mongkut’s University of Technology North Bangkok International Journal of Applied Science and Technology","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"King Mongkut’s University of Technology North Bangkok International Journal of Applied Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14416/j.ijast.2015.08.001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Presently, there is no specific guiding principle on the utilization of polymeric composites as a pile cushion pad. There is a prerequisite consequently to understand their mechanical behavior during a pile driving process. Hence, this article is concerned with the observations of mechanical behavior under cyclic loading application, compressive strength, coefficient of restitution, and permanent deformation of ultrahigh molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) and activated carbon (AC) composites. UHMWPE/AC composites containing 1, 3, 5, 10 and 20 wt% of AC concentrations were prepared for accomplishing the aim. Prior to those characterizations, the composites were compression molded under 160oC for various operating times (5 to 40 minutes). As a comparison to UHMWPE, applying AC into UHMWPE matrix significantly reduced the cycle time of the compression molding. Compressive strength at 80% deformation, tangent modulus and coefficient of restitution of UHMWPE were inferior to those properties of UHMWPE/AC composites. In terms of the coefficient of restitution, the coefficient values of composites were obviously higher than UHMWPE’s values. Moreover, the coefficient of restitution at 8,000 N/min of all samples was greater than a represented coefficient from the test at 2,000 N/min. UHMWPE/AC composites with 10 wt% of AC loading provided the best mechanically reversible performance. Experimental results also indicated that the mechanical property enhancement associated with an increase in UHMWPE’s molecular weight, while the creep strain of UHMWPE was affected by the applied amount of AC. Permanent deformation data illustrated that the increasing cycles of compression urged the deterioration as same as the results measured via cyclic compression testing. In overview, UHMWPE/AC composites showed a promise for future opportunities as a viable option in replacing a traditional material for manufacturing a pile cushion pad.
超高分子量聚乙烯桩垫材料力学性能研究
目前,高分子复合材料作为桩垫材料的应用尚无具体的指导原则。因此,了解它们在打桩过程中的力学行为是一个先决条件。因此,本文对超高分子量聚乙烯(UHMWPE)和活性炭(AC)复合材料在循环载荷作用下的力学行为、抗压强度、恢复系数和永久变形进行了研究。为实现这一目标,制备了AC浓度分别为1、3、5、10和20 wt%的超高分子量聚乙烯/AC复合材料。在这些表征之前,复合材料在160℃的不同操作时间(5到40分钟)下进行压缩成型。与UHMWPE相比,在UHMWPE基体中加入AC可显著缩短压缩成型周期。UHMWPE在80%变形时的抗压强度、切线模量和恢复系数均低于UHMWPE/AC复合材料。在恢复系数方面,复合材料的系数值明显高于超高分子量聚乙烯。此外,所有样本在8,000 N/min下的恢复系数都大于2,000 N/min试验的代表性系数。当交流负荷为10%时,超高分子量聚乙烯/交流复合材料具有最佳的机械可逆性能。实验结果还表明,超高分子量聚乙烯的力学性能增强与分子量的增加有关,而超高分子量聚乙烯的蠕变应变受AC用量的影响。永久变形数据表明,随着循环压缩次数的增加,超高分子量聚乙烯的劣化趋势与循环压缩试验结果一致。总的来说,UHMWPE/AC复合材料作为替代传统材料制造桩垫的可行选择,在未来有很大的发展前景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信